Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Effects of eye injections on pupil and heart in healthy cats
By Amorim, Tássia Moara et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2019·Faculdade de Medicina Veterinaria (FAVET), Brazil·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Effects of intracameral injection of epinephrine and 2% lidocaine on pupil diameter, intraocular pressure, and cardiovascular parameters in healthy cats.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of healthy cats received an injection of either epinephrine or two different doses of lidocaine to see how it affected their pupil size and eye pressure. The cats that got epinephrine had larger pupils that stayed dilated longer compared to those given lidocaine. Both treatments lowered eye pressure initially, but it returned to normal after a while. Importantly, neither treatment caused any harmful effects on heart rate or blood pressure. This suggests that epinephrine could be a good alternative for dilating pupils in cats during eye procedures.
People also search for: cat eye dilation treatment · epinephrine for cat pupils · lidocaine injection in cats · cat eye pressure treatment
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of the intracameral injection of epinephrine and two doses of 2% lidocaine on pupil diameter (PD), intraocular pressure (IOP), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in healthy cats. METHODS: Five treatment groups were formed (10 cats/each). Animals received 0.2 mL of epinephrine, 0.2 or 0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine, or 0.2 mL of BSS. Cats were anesthetized, and all solutions were injected intracamerally. PD, IOP, HR, and MAP were assessed at baseline, following anterior chamber paracentesis (T0), and at every 5 minutes, until anesthesia was terminated (T60). PD and IOP continued to be assessed for 2 additional hours during recovery from anesthesia. In another group, cats were not anesthetized and one of the eyes was treated with one drop of 0.5% tropicamide to check for maximal pupil diameter. RESULTS: Faster onset and longer duration of sufficient mydriasis (>10 mm) were observed in epinephrine treatment group, when comparing with cats treated with both doses of lidocaine. Eyes treated with epinephrine achieved the largest maximum pupil diameter (mm) when comparing with eyes treated with 0.3 mL of lidocaine (11.01 ± 0.16), tropicamide (10.66 ± 0.17), and 0.2 mL of lidocaine (10.23 ± 0.12) (P < .0001). In all groups, IOP decreased significantly at T0, but tended to return to baseline at T60. HR and MAP did not change significantly during time and among treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The intracameral injection of 0.2 mL of 1:100 000 epinephrine and 0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine can be used as an alternative to tropicamide in healthy cats. Both treatments produced satisfactory and long-lasting mydriasis without adverse effects on IOP, HR, and MAP.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29975454/