PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Nutritional support effects on hospital recovery in dogs and cats

By Brunetto, Marcio A et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2010·Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Brazil·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Effects of nutritional support on hospital outcome in dogs and cats.

Appetite & weight

Plain-English summary

A study looked at how nutritional support affected the recovery of 467 dogs and 55 cats in a veterinary hospital. It found that pets who received enough calories, whether by eating on their own or through assisted feeding, had a better chance of going home. For example, 92.9% of pets that ate voluntarily were discharged, compared to only 38.4% of those that didn't receive any calories. The research also showed that pets with a healthy weight had a higher discharge rate than those who were underweight. Overall, providing adequate nutrition is important for helping sick pets recover and leave the hospital.

People also search for: dog hospital recovery nutrition · cat feeding support after surgery · why is my pet not eating in the hospital

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the effects of assisted nutritional support on hospital outcome in dogs and cats, and the relationship between hospital outcome and energy intake, body condition score (BCS), physical status score, and type of nutritional support used. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of hospitalized animals. SETTING: Teaching Veterinary Hospital. ANIMALS: Four hundred and sixty-seven dogs and 55 cats. INTERVENTIONS: Routine clinical nutritional support. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The following variables were recorded for each animal: energy intake, body weight at admission and discharge, BCS, physical status score, and type of nutritional support used. Disease severity was negatively associated with hospital outcome and energy intake (P=0.009). Energy intake was positively associated with hospital discharge (P<0.001). Outcome may be related to BCS, with discharge rates of 73% for animals with low BCS, and 84.7% for those at an ideal BCS or overweight (P=0.04). Sixty-four percent of animals showed voluntary food intake (92.9% were discharged), 19.0% received enteral support (71.8% were discharged), 7.0% were forced fed (75.0% were discharged), 6.0% received parenteral support (61.9% were discharged), and 4.0% did not receive calories (38.4% were discharged), suggesting a possible relationship between the type of nutritional support, energy intake, and outcome (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Energy supply, even if modest and close to resting energy requirements appears to be positively associated with hospital discharge. However, disease severity was the main negative factor on outcome and also had a negative effect on energy intake, making it difficult to separate the effects of both factors when interpreting hospital discharge. Thin animals with low BCS had greater mortality.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20487250/