PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Do oral heartworm pills affect dogs' eye function and pupil response

By Hopper, Ryan G et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2026·Department of Surgical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Effects of Oral Macrocyclic Lactone Heartworm Preventatives on Retinal Function and Chromatic Pupillary Light Reflex in Healthy Companion Dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study looked at whether oral heartworm preventatives affected the eyesight of healthy dogs. Researchers tested the retinal function and pupil response in 85 dogs before and after giving them the medication. They found no significant changes in how well the dogs' eyes responded to light or their overall retinal function after taking the heartworm preventatives. This suggests that these medications are safe for vision and any potential risks are minimal compared to their benefits in preventing heartworm disease.

People also search for: dog heartworm preventative side effects · do heartworm pills affect dog vision · heartworm medication safety for dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine the effect of oral macrocyclic lactone heartworm-preventative medications on retinal function and chromatic pupillary light reflex (cPLR) in healthy dogs. ANIMALS STUDIED: Cross-sectional retrospective: 60 dogs (n = 33 females) with heartworm medication administration status and electroretinogram (ERG) data available. Prospective clinical study: 25 dogs (n = 10 females) had ERG performed, 18 of which had cPLR performed. PROCEDURES: Retrospective: ERG amplitudes/peak times were compared between dogs that had or had not received oral heartworm preventatives. Bivariate and multiple variable linear regression models were used to evaluate relationships between ERG testing and heartworm preventive administration status, age, and sex. PROSPECTIVE: ERG and cPLR testing were performed at a baseline visit (minimum 14 days since last preventative administration), and a second visit where ERG/cPLR testing was performed 4 h after oral preventative administration. Mixed effects models and Mann-Whitney U statistics were performed. RESULTS: Retrospective: There was no association between heartworm preventive administration status and ERG amplitudes or peak times (all p-values > 0.12). PROSPECTIVE: Heartworm preventative had no effect on light- and dark-adapted ERG amplitudes or peak times (all p-values > 0.56). Similarly, there was no effect on baseline pupil size (p = 0.83), nor on cPLR (p = 0.32). CONCLUSION: No significant effects of oral macrocyclic lactones on retinal/cPLR function at preventative doses were identified. While small effects on retinal/cPLR function cannot be completely ruled out, it remains unlikely that these medications cause clinically significant visual deficits at prescribed doses, and proven antiparasitic benefits likely far outweigh small potential ophthalmic risks of administration.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39894736/