Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Dog surgery outcomes after bladder retroflexion in perineal hernia
By Grand, Jean-Guillaume et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2013·Clinique vé, France·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Effects of urinary bladder retroflexion and surgical technique on postoperative complication rates and long-term outcome in dogs with perineal hernia: 41 cases (2002-2009).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 41 dogs with perineal hernia underwent surgery to fix the problem, with some having a procedure called urinary bladder retroflexion (UBR) and others not. After surgery, most dogs recovered well, with 32 showing no signs of the condition returning. There were some minor complications like straining to defecate and one case of urinary incontinence, but these were similar in both groups. The study suggests that UBR doesn't lead to more complications and that a simpler surgical technique might be just as effective for these dogs.
People also search for: dog perineal hernia surgery recovery · urinary bladder retroflexion in dogs · dog surgery complications · perineal hernia treatment options
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of urinary bladder retroflexion (UBR) and surgical technique on postoperative complication rates and long-term outcome in dogs with perineal hernia. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: 41 client-owned dogs with perineal hernia that underwent surgery between November 2002 and November 2009. PROCEDURES: Medical records were reviewed for information on dog signalment, history, physical examination findings, ultrasonographic findings, surgical techniques, intraoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and long-term outcome. RESULTS: 31 dogs had no UBR, and 10 dogs had UBR. Internal obturator muscle transposition (IOMT) was performed in 20 dogs, and a cystopexy or colopexy was performed before the IOMT (LapIOMT) in 21. Postoperative complications included tenesmus (n = 8) and urinary incontinence (1). Rates of postoperative complications were not significantly different between the no-UBR and UBR groups or between the IOMT and LapIOMT groups. Thirty-two dogs were free of clinical signs at the time of the study. The median disease-free interval did not differ significantly between dogs in the no-UBR and UBR groups, but it was significantly lower in the LapIOMT group than in the IOMT group. None of the 7 dogs with UBR that were treated without cystopexy developed recurrence of UBR. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: UBR was not associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications relative to no UBR and had no effect on the long-term outcome in dogs with perineal hernia. The use of IOMT alone may be recommended for clinical use because LapIOMT offered no clear advantage.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24171374/