Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Pimobendan is safe and effective for dogs with mitral valve heart
By Smith, P J et al.·Published in The Journal of small animal practice·2005·Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies Hospital for Small Animals, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Efficacy and safet of pimobendan in canine heart failure caused by myxomatous mitral valve disease.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with mild to moderate heart failure caused by a heart valve problem (myxomatous mitral valve disease) were treated with either pimobendan or ramipril for six months. The dogs receiving pimobendan had fewer complications related to their heart failure compared to those on ramipril, making it a safer option. Overall, the study suggests that pimobendan may be a better choice for managing this type of heart failure in dogs, as it was well tolerated and resulted in fewer adverse outcomes.
People also search for: dog heart failure treatment · pimobendan for dogs · myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of pimobendan by comparing it with ramipril over a six-month period in dogs with mild to moderate heart failure (HF) caused by myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD). METHODS: This was a prospective randomised, single-blind, parallel-group trial. Client-owned dogs (n = 43) with mild to moderate HF caused by MMVD were randomly assigned to one of two groups, which received either pimobendan (P dogs) or ramipril (R dogs) for six months. The outcome measures studied were: adverse HF outcome, defined as failure to complete the trial as a direct consequence of HF; maximum furosemide dose (mg/kg/day) administered during the study period; and any requirement for additional visits to the clinic as a direct consequence of HF. RESULTS: Treatment with pimobendan was well tolerated compared with treatment with ramipril. P dogs were 25 per cent as likely as R dogs to have an adverse HF outcome (odds ratio 4.09, 95 per cent confidence interval 1.03 to 16.3, P = 0.046). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: R dogs had a higher overall score and thus may have had more advanced disease than P dogs at baseline (P = 0.04). These results should be interpreted cautiously but such a high odds ratio warrants further investigation.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15789807/