PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Oral sarolaner (Simparica) safely treats flea and tick infestations

By Becskei, Csilla et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology·2016·Zoetis·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Efficacy and safety of a novel oral isoxazoline, sarolaner (Simparica™) in the treatment of naturally occurring flea and tick infestations in dogs presented as veterinary patients in Europe.

Species:
dog
Skin & coatDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with flea and tick infestations were treated with a new chewable tablet called sarolaner (Simparica) to see how well it worked. Over three months, the treatment showed a 98.8% to 100% effectiveness against fleas and a 97.4% to 100% effectiveness against ticks, outperforming other common treatments at certain points. Dogs with flea allergy dermatitis (FAD) also saw improvement in their symptoms after treatment. The tablets were well-liked by the dogs, with most eating them quickly. Overall, sarolaner was found to be safe and very effective for treating fleas and ticks in dogs.

People also search for: dog flea treatment · sarolaner for ticks · dog flea allergy dermatitis treatment · Simparica effectiveness · how to treat dog ticks

Abstract

Two randomised, blinded, multi-centered field studies were conducted in Europe to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of three monthly oral doses of sarolaner (Simparica™, Zoetis) administered at a minimum dosage of 2.0mg/kg (range 2-4mg/kg) against natural flea or tick infestation of dogs presented as veterinary patients. In the flea study, the improvement in clinical signs associated with flea allergy dermatitis (FAD) was also investigated. The palatability of the sarolaner chewable tablet formulation was evaluated in both studies. Spinosad (Comfortis(®) Chewable Tablets, Elanco) and fipronil (Frontline(®) Spot on, Merial) were used as positive controls in the flea and tick study, respectively. Treatments were administered on Days 0, 30 and 60. Efficacy was calculated based on the mean percent reduction of live parasite counts on post-treatment days 14, 30, 60 and 90 versus the pre-treatment count on Day 0. Non-inferiority of sarolaner to the control products was assessed at each time-point using a margin of 15% at the one-sided 0.025 significance level. Dogs were enrolled in a 2:1 ratio (sarolaner:comparator); 285 flea- and 181 tick-infested dogs were assessed for efficacy and safety, and 137 and 48 dogs were assessed for safety only, in the flea and tick study, respectively. There were no treatment-related adverse events. Efficacy against fleas was 98.8%, 99.4%, >99.9% and >99.9% in the sarolaner-treated group and 98.9%, 93.7%, 96.8% and 95.1% in the spinosad-treated group on Days 14, 30, 60 and 90, respectively. Sarolaner was non-inferior to spinosad at all time-points and was superior on Day 30. For the 42 dogs identified as having FAD at enrolment, the clinical signs of FAD improved in all dogs and the incidence was markedly reduced by the end of the study. Efficacy against ticks was 97.4%, 97.6%, 99.8% and 100% in the sarolaner-treated group and 94.1%, 88.5%, 89.9% and 98.1% in the fipronil-treated group on Days 14, 30, 60 and 90, respectively. Sarolaner was non-inferior to fipronil at all time-points, and was superior on Days 30 and 60. Sarolaner tablets were voluntarily and fully consumed within one minute in 93% of the 1280 occasions offered. Sarolaner administered orally at monthly intervals at a minimum dosage of 2 mg/kg was safe and highly effective against natural infestations of fleas and ticks on dogs. In addition, clinical signs FAD improved in dogs treated with sarolaner, and the flavored, chewable tablets were highly palatable.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26994516/