PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Topical treatment with esafoxolaner stops Gulf Coast ticks on cats

By Tielemans, Eric et al.·Published in Parasite (Paris, France)·2024·Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, France·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Efficacy of a topical combination of esafoxolaner, eprinomectin and praziquantel against Amblyomma maculatum infestations in cats.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

Ten cats were tested for tick infestations caused by Gulf Coast ticks, which can carry diseases. Half of the cats received a topical treatment called NexGard Combo, while the other half did not receive any treatment. The results showed that the treated cats had a 98.7% reduction in ticks just 72 hours after the treatment, and over the next five weeks, the treatment prevented 93.8% to 99.4% of new tick infestations. This means that NexGard Combo is highly effective for controlling ticks in cats.

People also search for: cat tick treatment · Gulf Coast tick prevention for cats · NexGard Combo efficacy for cats

Abstract

Amblyomma maculatum, the Gulf Coast tick, infests a wide range of vertebrate species including livestock, dogs, cats, and humans. It is a species of significant veterinary and public health importance, especially as a vector of diseases, for instance American canine hepatozoonosis or tidewater spotted fever. An experimental study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of NexGardCombo, a topical endectoparasiticide product for cats combining eprinomectin, praziquantel and esafoxolaner, against induced infestations of A. maculatum in cats. This Good Clinical Practice (GCP) study used a randomized, negative controlled, masked design. Ten cats were allocated to an untreated group and ten to a treated group, dosed once on Day 0 at the minimum label dose. On Days -2, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42, cats were infested with ~50 unfed adult A. maculatum. On Days 3, 10, 17, 24, 31, 38, and 45, i.e., 72 h after treatment and subsequent infestations, ticks were removed, counted and the numbers of live attached tick in each group were used for efficacy calculations. At each time-point, all untreated cats were adequately infested, demonstrating a vigorous tick population and an adequate study model. The curative efficacy after a single application against existing tick infestation, 72 h after treatment, was 98.7%. The preventive efficacy, 72 h after weekly infestations, over the following five weeks ranged from 93.8% to 99.4%.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39109981/