Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Pain relief in dogs with chemically caused joint inflammation using
By Cathcart, Curtis J et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2012·Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Efficacy of ABT-116, an antagonist of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1, in providing analgesia for dogs with chemically induced synovitis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of mixed-breed dogs was tested for lameness caused by a painful joint condition after receiving different treatments. The dogs were given either a low dose or a high dose of a new pain medication called ABT-116, a common pain reliever called firocoxib, or no treatment at all. While the low dose of ABT-116 did help reduce lameness somewhat, it wasn't as effective as firocoxib. However, both doses of ABT-116 caused an increase in body temperature, which could be a concern.
People also search for: dog lameness treatment · ABT-116 for dogs · firocoxib side effects · joint pain relief for dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of ABT-116 (a proprietary antagonist of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1) administered at 2 doses to attenuate lameness in dogs with experimentally induced urate synovitis. ANIMALS: 8 purpose-bred mixed-breed dogs. PROCEDURES: In a 4-way crossover study, dogs orally received each of low-dose ABT-116 treatment (LDA; 10 mg/kg), high-dose ABT-116 treatment (HDA; 30 mg/kg), firocoxib (5 mg/kg), and no treatment (nontreatment) once a day for 2 days, in a randomly assigned order. Synovitis was induced on the second day of each treatment period by intra-articular injection of either stifle joint with sodium urate, alternating between joints for each treatment period, beginning with the left stifle joint. Ground reaction forces, clinical lameness scores, and rectal temperature were assessed before the injection (baseline) and at various points afterward. RESULTS: Lameness scores at the 2-, 6-, and 12-hour assessment points were higher than baseline scores for HDA and nontreatment, whereas scores at the 2- and 6-hour points were higher than baseline scores for LDA. For firocoxib, there was no difference from baseline scores in lameness scores at any point. Compared with baseline values, peak vertical force and vertical impulse were lower at 2 and 6 hours for HDA and nontreatment and at 2 hours for LDA. No changes in these values were evident for firocoxib. The HDA or LDA resulted in higher rectal temperatures than did treatment with firocoxib or nothing, but those temperatures did not differ among treatments. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: HDA had no apparent effect on sodium urate-induced lameness; LDA did attenuate the lameness but not as completely as firocoxib treatment. High rectal temperature is an adverse effect of oral ABT-116 administration that may be of clinical concern.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22204284/