PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Oral nutraceutical helps dogs with osteoarthritis pain and activity

By Scott, Ruth M et al.·Published in Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T·2017·University of Minnesota, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Efficacy of an oral nutraceutical for the treatment of canine osteoarthritis. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled prospective clinical trial.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with osteoarthritis (OA) were given either a special oral supplement (Glu/CS+) or a placebo to see if it would help their joint pain and improve their activity levels. Over 90 days, both groups showed improvements in pain scores reported by their owners, but there was no significant difference in activity levels between the two groups. This suggests that while the supplement didn't lead to more movement, owners felt their dogs were doing better overall. No serious side effects were noted during the study.

People also search for: dog osteoarthritis treatment · Glu/CS+ for dogs · how to help my dog with joint pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of an orally administered nutraceutical (Glu/CS+; + for additional ingredient) for the treatment of clinical osteoarthritis (OA) in dogs. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, client-owned dogs with clinical signs of OA in one or more joints were assigned to a Glu/CS+ (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) group. Dogs were administered Glu/CS+ or placebo orally and wore an activity monitor (AM) continuously throughout a 97 day study period. Prior to the initiation of the treatment, seven days of baseline activity was collected. On days -7, 30, 60 and 90 of the study, owners completed a patient assessment form (Canine Brief Pain Inventory). Data between groups were compared. RESULTS: No serious adverse events were reported. No difference was found between groups when evaluating daily activity counts during the seven-day pre-treatment period and the 90-day treatment period. Owner assessment (pain interference and pain severity scores) improved over the 90-day treatment period for both groups, however no difference was found between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with oral Glu/CS+ for a 90 day treatment period when compared to placebo treatment did not result in a significant increase in activity counts in dogs with clinical OA. However, owner assessment scores similarly improved throughout the study period for dogs in both groups, suggesting a caregiver placebo effect in this outcome measure.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28763523/