PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How cross-linked hyaluronic acid boosts antibiotic eye drops in dogs

By Arad, Dikla et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2026·Koret School of Veterinary Medicine·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Enhanced Tear Film Concentrations of Cefazolin and Chloramphenicol Using Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid in Canine Eyes.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of ten healthy dogs had their eyes treated with two different antibiotic solutions to see which one worked better. One solution used cross-linked hyaluronic acid (XHA) and the other used polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). The results showed that the antibiotic levels in the tear film were significantly higher with the XHA solution compared to the PVA solution. This means that using XHA could help deliver eye medications more effectively, which may improve treatment for eye infections in dogs.

People also search for: dog eye infection treatment · cefazolin for dogs · chloramphenicol eye drops for dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of two excipients, 1.4% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and 0.75% cross-linked hyaluronic acid (XHA), on tear film concentrations of cefazolin and chloramphenicol. ANIMALS STUDIED: Ten ophthalmologically healthy dogs. PROCEDURES: Cefazolin and chloramphenicol were compounded into 5.5% and 0.5% solutions, respectively, using either 1.4% PVA or 0.75% XHA. In the first trial, each dog received cefazolin-PVA in one randomly assigned eye and cefazolin-XHA in the contralateral eye. One month later, the experiment was repeated using chloramphenicol formulations. Tear fluid was sampled at 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 min following eyedrop administration using 2 μL capillary tubes. Tear concentrations of cefazolin and chloramphenicol were measured using UV-Vis spectrophotometry. RESULTS: Tear film concentrations of cefazolin and chloramphenicol were significantly higher with XHA compared to PVA at all time points (p ≤ 0.020), except for baseline (both antibiotics), times 1 min, 60 min, and 120 min for cefazolin. The tear film kinetics exhibited a biphasic pattern, with drug levels decreasing from 0 to 120 min, then slightly increasing between 120 and 360 min before declining again until 480 min. The area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) was significantly greater with XHA versus PVA formulations (p = 0.002), with a median 2.4 and 4.2 times higher for cefazolin and chloramphenicol, respectively. CONCLUSION: The cross-linked hyaluronic acid significantly enhanced the retention and overall exposure of both cefazolin and chloramphenicol in the canine tear film. These findings suggest that XHA could serve as a superior delivery vehicle for ocular antibiotics, potentially improving treatment outcomes for ophthalmic infections.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40091159/