Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Postoperative wound infection rates in dogs and cats
By Brown, D C et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·1997·Department of Clinical Studies, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Epidemiologic evaluation of postoperative wound infections in dogs and cats.
Plain-English summary
A study looked at infection rates in wounds from surgeries on dogs and cats, finding that about 5.5% of wounds became infected. The research showed that wounds clipped before anesthesia were three times more likely to get infected compared to those clipped afterward. Additionally, animals with clean wounds who received unnecessary antibiotics had higher infection rates. To reduce the risk of infection, it's best to clip surgical sites right before surgery and keep surgery duration as short as possible.
People also search for: dog surgery infection rates · cat wound care after surgery · how to prevent infection in dog wounds
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine postoperative wound infection rates in dogs and cats for various wound contamination categories and to identify factors that influence postoperative wound infection rates. DESIGN: Epidemiologic study. SAMPLE POPULATION: 1,574 wounds in 1,255 dogs and cats. PROCEDURE: Information recorded included signalment, nutritional status, surgery duration, surgical procedures, wound contamination classification, interval from clipping until surgery, blood pressure values, active infection at a distant site, endocrinopathy, and administration of immunosuppressive medications or antibiotics. Relative risk, 95% confidence intervals, and multiple regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Postoperative infection was evident in 86 of 1,574 (5.5%) wounds, including 54 of 1,146(4.7%) and 13 of 259 (5.0%) animals with clean and clean-contaminated wounds respectively, and 12 of 100 (12.0%) and 7 of 69 (10.1%) animals with contaminated and dirty wounds, respectively. Animals with clean wounds that received antibiotics other than as prescribed in our perioperative protocol had a higher infection rate than animals that did not receive antibiotics. Surgical sites clipped before anesthetic induction were 3 times more likely to become infected than sites clipped after induction. Risk of wound infection increased with increasing duration of surgery. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Wound contamination categories had too much variation to make them useful for predicting animals that would develop wound infections. Surgical sites should be clipped immediately prior to surgery, and intraoperative time should be kept to a minimum. Unless indicated for other current active infection, prolonged use of antibiotics after surgery should be avoided in animals with clean wounds.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9143534/