PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Pain relief with epidural or quadratus lumborum block in dogs

By Nejamkin, Pablo et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2026·Hospital Escuela de Peque&#xf1·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Epidural and quadratus lumborum blocks with 1% lidocaine provide comparable analgesia while maintaining cardiovascular and respiratory stability in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

Species:
dog
Breathing & coughDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 24 healthy female mixed-breed dogs, around 1.5 years old, underwent spaying (ovariohysterectomy) and received either an epidural injection or a quadratus lumborum block with 1% lidocaine for pain relief. Both methods provided effective pain control during and after the surgery without causing any changes in heart rate or breathing. The dogs had low pain scores after the procedure and did not need additional pain medication. This means both techniques are safe and effective for managing pain in dogs during spaying.

People also search for: dog spay surgery pain relief · epidural vs quadratus lumborum block for dogs · lidocaine for dog surgery pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic efficacy and cardiovascular and respiratory effects of lumbosacral epidural (EP) and ultrasound-guided lateral quadratus lumborum (QL) block with 1% lidocaine in dogs undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy (OVH). METHODS: Following an experimental, prospective study design, dogs presented for OVH at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires during 2024 to 2025 were randomly assigned to receive either an EP injection of 1% lidocaine (0.4 mL/kg) or a bilateral QL block with the same formulation and dose per site (n = 12 each group). All dogs were premedicated with dexmedetomidine and meloxicam, anesthetized with propofol, and maintained with sevoflurane under spontaneous ventilation. Intraoperative analgesic requirements, physiological variables, and postoperative pain scores were evaluated for 6 hours after extubation. RESULTS: 24 healthy, female mixed-breed dogs (mean age, 1.65 years [SD, 0.8 years]; mean weight, 17.45 kg [SD, 6 kg]) were included in the study. A total of 23 dogs completed the study; 1 QL case was excluded due to block failure. No evidence of differences was observed between groups in heart rate, blood pressure, or respiratory parameters. The number of fentanyl boluses did not differ between groups. Postoperative pain scores were similarly low in both groups, with no need for rescue analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: EP and QL blocks with 1% lidocaine provided comparable anesthetic stability and postoperative analgesia in dogs premedicated with dexmedetomidine and meloxicam undergoing OVH. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: EP and QL blocks with 1% lidocaine provided similar anesthetic and analgesic effects, with the EP technique requiring less equipment and patient manipulation.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41442846/