Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Comparing 0.1% and 1% atropine eyedrops for cats' eye treatment
By Handel, Karin W et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2025·Koret School of Veterinary Medicine·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of 0.1% and 1% atropine eyedrops in cats: A comparative study of tolerance, stability, and efficacy.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of six cats were tested with two different strengths of atropine eye drops to see how well they worked and how the cats reacted. The cats received either 0.1% or 1% atropine in one eye, while the other eye got artificial tears as a control. The cats experienced fewer side effects and shorter reactions with the 0.1% atropine compared to the stronger 1% version. Both eye drops effectively dilated the pupils, but the 0.1% atropine was better tolerated, making it a safer option for cats that might have issues with the stronger concentration.
People also search for: cat eye drops side effects · atropine for cats · cat pupil dilation treatment
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the tolerance, stability, and efficacy of topical 0.1% and 1% atropine in cats. PROCEDURES: Six cats underwent two trials separated by a 2-week washout period. One drop of artificial tears was placed in one randomly selected eye (control), and one drop of either 0.1% atropine (Trial I) or 1% atropine (Trial II) was placed in the other eye. Immediate adverse effects were recorded for severity (0-3) and duration (seconds). Horizontal pupil diameter (HPD), pupillary light reflexes (PLRs), intraocular pressure (IOP), Schirmer tear test-1 (STT-1), and heart rate (HR) were monitored at baseline then 8 h post-administration. PLRs were assessed for a total of 72 h. Stability was assessed weekly for 1 month in room temperature and refrigerated conditions, evaluating solution clarity, pH, and drug concentrations. RESULTS: Adverse effects had a significantly lower severity score and shorter duration with 0.1% versus 1% atropine (severity 1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 2.5 ± 0.5, p = .010; duration 107.5 ± 53.3 vs. 293.3 ± 106.5 s, p = .009). HPD was significantly greater than baseline measurements as early as 40 min for both atropine formulations. Pupils were non-responsive for a significantly shorter duration with 0.1% versus 1% atropine (median 7 h vs. 47.5 h, p = .031). Compared with control eyes, IOP was significantly elevated by 1% atropine (p = .021) but not 0.1% atropine (p = .502). No significant differences were noted in STT-1 and HR measurements. Both solutions were stable in room temperature and refrigerated conditions for 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: Diluted 0.1% atropine was stable and better tolerated by cats, offering a potential alternative to feline patients that experience adverse effects from topical 1% atropine.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39175191/