Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Tongue reduction surgery effects on airway size in flat-faced dogs
By Colberg, Valeria T et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2025·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of a caudal midline glossectomy on tongue volume and upper airway cross-sectional areas in brachycephalic dogs: a cadaveric study.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of brachycephalic dogs, known for their short snouts, may struggle with breathing due to their large tongues. A surgical procedure called caudal midline glossectomy (CMG) was tested to see if it could help by reducing tongue size and improving airflow. The results showed that CMG decreased tongue volume by 20% and significantly increased the space in the throat, which could help these dogs breathe better. This suggests that CMG might be a helpful option for dogs with breathing problems related to their tongue size.
People also search for: brachycephalic dog breathing problems · tongue surgery for dogs · how to help dog with airway obstruction
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Relative macroglossia may contribute to brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome, the pathologic disorder associated with respiratory dysfunction commonly seen in brachycephalic dogs. Recent studies on brachycephalic dogs have demonstrated a relative macroglossia along with reduced air volume in the upper airway compared to non-brachycephalic dogs. Tongue reduction glossectomy may be a surgical option to address upper airway obstruction secondary to macroglossia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a caudal midline glossectomy (CMG) on tongue volume and upper airway cross-sectional areas. METHODS: Cadaveric brachycephalic dogs ( = 6) were positioned with the tongue retracted and jaw nearly closed. Computed tomography was performed to evaluate tongue volume and cross-sectional areas of tongue, oropharynx, palatal soft tissue and nasopharynx at two levels, the caudal aspect of the hard palate and pterygoid hamulae. A standardized CMG was performed. Positioning and CT scan were repeated. RESULTS: CMG resulted in a 20% decrease in tongue volume (from 87,546 ± 21,121 to 70,259 ± 17,586 mm; < 0.01). CMG resulted in a 20 to 25% decrease in cross-sectional area of the tongue at both hard palate (from 1662 ± 311 to 1339 ± 254 mm; < 0.01) and pterygoid hamulae (from 1425 ± 222 to 1041 ± 150 mm; < 0.01), and 2 to 3-fold increase in cross-sectional area of the oropharynx at both hard palate (from 226 ± 68 to 595 ± 138 mm; < 0.01) and pterygoid hamulae (from 110 ± 64 to 351 ± 37 mm; < 0.01). DISCUSSION: This study provides preliminary guidelines toward the feasibility and potential benefit of CMG in select cases of macroglossia-associated upper airway obstruction.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40831897/