PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Dental sealant reduces plaque in beagle dogs after cleaning

By Sitzman, Clarence·Published in Journal of veterinary dentistry·2013·Peak Veterinary Specialists, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of a hydrophilic gingival dental sealant in beagle dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 30 beagle dogs had a special dental sealant applied to help prevent gum disease after their teeth were cleaned. This sealant forms a protective barrier that reduces plaque and tartar buildup. Over 30 days, the dogs showed a significant decrease in plaque by an average of 40% and tartar by about 24% on the treated side. Importantly, there were no negative side effects observed, making this sealant a promising option for keeping dogs' teeth and gums healthy.

People also search for: dog dental sealant · beagle gum disease prevention · plaque removal for dogs · dental care for dogs

Abstract

A liquid solution, gingival sealant containing polymers that form a barrier film upon application was evaluated in dogs. It is a non-toxic, low viscosity, hydrophilic barrier sealant that dries in approximately 10 to 15-seconds after subgingival application. It was designed as a preventative to be applied immediately following a professional oral hygiene procedure in order to block plaque and calculus formation in the sulcus and aid in the prevention of periodontal disease in companion animals. Additionally, the polymer was designed to promote an aerobic environment in the sulcus by oxygen and water transport through engineered pores within the polymer. A 30-day split-mouth, blinded study in two groups of 15 beagle dogs was used. Plaque was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced on the side receiving the sealant by 30.0% and 50.5% (average = 40.3%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Calculus was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced on the side receiving the sealant by 27.2% and 20.0% (average = 23.6%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Gingival inflammation was monitored to assess product safety. Sides receiving sealant showed no statistically significant differences in gingival index score. No adverse events were observed in the study. This study demonstrates that this gingival sealant can be used as another valuable tool for aiding in the prevention of periodontal disease in dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24371922/