Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
New in-clinic test for cat FIV and FeLV infections evaluated
By Sand, Christina et al.·Published in Veterinary Clinical Pathology·2010·View original on Crossref →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of a new in‐clinic test system to detect feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus infection
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of cats was tested for feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukemia virus (FeLV) using a new in-clinic test called the Anigen Rapid Test. The study found that this test was quite accurate, especially for FIV, where it correctly identified 89% of infected cats. For FeLV, the test was less sensitive but still had a high accuracy overall. Both tests showed similar results, making the Anigen Rapid Test a reliable option for veterinarians to diagnose these viral infections in cats.
People also search for: cat FIV test accuracy · feline leukemia virus test · new test for cat viruses · how to test for FIV in cats
Abstract
Background:Many in‐house tests for the diagnosis of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infection are licensed for use in veterinary practice. A new test with unknown performance has recently appeared on the market.Objectives:The aims of this study were to define the efficacy of a new in‐clinic test system, the Anigen Rapid FIV Ab/FeLV Ag Test, and to compare it with the current leading in‐clinic test, the SNAP Kombi Plus FeLV Antigen/FIB Antibody Test.Methods:Three‐hundred serum samples from randomly selected healthy and diseased cats presented to the Clinic of Small Animal Medicine at Ludwig Maximilian University were tested using both the Anigen Rapid Test and the SNAP Kombi Plus Test. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for both tests using Western blot as the gold standard for verification of FIV infection and PCR as the gold standard for FeLV infection.Results:The presence of antibodies against FIV was confirmed by Western blot in 9/300 samples (prevalence 3%). FeLV DNA was detected by PCR in 15/300 samples (prevalence 5%). For FIV infection the Anigen Rapid Test had a sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 99.7%, positive predictive value of 88.9%, and negative predictive value of 99.7%. For FeLV infection, the Anigen Rapid Test had a sensitivity of 40.0%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 96.9%. Diagnostic accuracy was similar to that of the SNAP Kombi Plus Test.Conclusion:The new Anigen Rapid FIV Ab/FeLV Ag Test performed very well and can be recommended for use in veterinary practice.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-165x.2009.00196.x