PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

New handheld eye camera tested for cat eye exams without pupil

By Şengöz Şirin, Özlem et al.·Published in Veterinary medicine and science·2025·Department of Surgery·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of a New Non-Mydriatic Handheld Fundus Camera for Fundus Imaging in Cats: A Retrospective Study: 208 Cases (2023-2024).

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of 208 cats had their eyes examined using a new handheld camera that takes pictures of the back of the eye without needing to dilate the pupils. This method is less stressful for the cats and allows for quick, high-quality images. Most of the cats had normal eye health, but four were found to have retinal problems. The camera provided clear images, making it easier for veterinarians to diagnose and monitor eye conditions without the discomfort of traditional methods.

People also search for: cat eye problems · non-dilated fundus imaging in cats · retinal disease in cats · handheld fundus camera for cats

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In small animals such as cats, fundus imaging plays a critical role in early diagnosis of eye diseases and monitoring of treatment processes. Traditional methods usually require dilation of the pupil, which in some cases may require anaesthesia or cause discomfort for the animals. In recent years, non-mydriatic fundus cameras, especially with the development of handheld models, offer a new alternative that simplifies this process. These cameras allow high-quality fundus images to be obtained without the need for pupil dilation. This helps veterinarians save time and resources during examinations, while also providing a less stressful experience for the animals. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the use and image quality of the new non-mydriatic handheld fundus camera (Aurora, Optomed, Oulu, Finland) for fundus imaging in cats. METHODS: Fundus photographs of 208 cats were obtained using a handheld, non-mydriatic fundus camera. Undilated colour images of each eye centred on the optic disc were taken in a dimly lit room using a non-mydriatic fundus camera. The image acquisition protocol consisted in a single 50° colour photo centred on the cats optic disc. Images were evaluated for normal and pathological fundus. In addition, the obtained fundus images were evaluated in terms of centration, clarity and visible range parameters, with the quality score of each parameter varying between 2 (excellent) and 0 (ungradable). RESULTS: Although 204 of 208 cats had a normal fundus, four cats had retinal pathology. The optic disc was defined as well-centred in 412 of 416 eyes, partially centred in 3 eyes and not centred in 1 eye. Fundus vessels were clearly visible in 409 eyes, recognisable in 6 eyes and not recognisable in 1 eye. The entire image was visible in 413 eyes; more than 80% of the image was visible in 2 eyes, and less than 80% of the image was visible in 1 eye. The mean image quality scores for image centration, clarity and visible range were 1.99, 1.98 and 1.99, respectively, in 416 eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated fundus camera appears to be suitable for use in fundus imaging in non-dilated eyes of cats, and the quality of the images obtained is significantly satisfactory.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40264280/