Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How a new collar tracks at-home activity in large dogs
By Yashari, Jonathan M et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2015·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of a novel canine activity monitor for at-home physical activity analysis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study tested a new, affordable activity monitor called Whistle, designed to track how much exercise dogs get at home. Eleven large breed dogs wore this device alongside a more established monitor for 24 hours while their owners went about normal activities. The results showed that the Whistle device provided reliable data on the dogs' activity levels, closely matching the results from the other monitor. This means pet owners can use the Whistle to easily keep track of their dog's physical activity, although it does have some limitations like battery life and the need for Wi-Fi.
People also search for: dog activity monitor · how to track dog exercise · Whistle activity monitor review · affordable dog fitness tracker · best way to monitor dog activity
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accelerometers are motion-sensing devices that have been used to assess physical activity in dogs. However, the lack of a user-friendly, inexpensive accelerometer has hindered the widespread use of this objective outcome measure in veterinary research. Recently, a smartphone-based, affordable activity monitor (Whistle) has become available for measurement of at-home physical activity in dogs. The aim of this research was to evaluate this novel accelerometer. Eleven large breed, privately owned dogs wore a collar fitted with both the Whistle device and a previously validated accelerometer-based activity monitor (Actical) for a 24-h time period. Owners were asked to have their dogs resume normal daily activities. Total activity time obtained from the Whistle device in minutes was compared to the total activity count from the Actical device. Activity intensity from the Whistle device was calculated manually from screenshots of the activity bars displayed in the smartphone-application and compared to the activity count recorded by the Actical in the same 3-min time period. RESULTS: A total of 3740 time points were compared. There was a strong correlation between activity intensity of both devices for individual time points (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.81, p < 0.0001). An even stronger correlation was observed between the total activity data between the two devices (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.925, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Activity data provided by the Whistle activity monitor may be used as an objective outcome measurement in dogs. The total activity time provided by the Whistle application offers an inexpensive method for obtaining at-home, canine, real-time physical activity data. Limitations of the Whistle device include the limited battery life, the need for manual derivation of activity intensity data and data transfer, and the requirement of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth availability for data transmission.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26141484/