Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How accurate is a quick blood test for pets on chemotherapy?
By Lara-Garcia, Ana et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2008·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of a point-of-care hematology analyzer for use in dogs and cats receiving chemotherapeutic treatment.
Plain-English summary
A group of 105 dogs and 25 cats undergoing chemotherapy had their blood tested using a new point-of-care hematology analyzer to see how well it worked compared to traditional lab methods. The analyzer showed strong accuracy in measuring white blood cells, neutrophils, and hematocrit levels, which are important for monitoring pets during cancer treatment. It was particularly effective at detecting low white blood cell counts (leukopenia) and anemia, which are common concerns in pets receiving chemotherapy. Overall, this tool can help veterinarians keep a close eye on pets' blood health during treatment.
People also search for: dog chemotherapy blood test · cat cancer treatment monitoring · point-of-care analyzer for pets
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare WBC, neutrophil, and platelet counts and Hct values obtained with a point-of-care hematology analyzer with values obtained by a reference method for dogs and cats receiving chemotherapy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. ANIMALS: 105 dogs and 25 cats undergoing chemotherapy. PROCEDURES: Blood samples were analyzed with a point-of-care hematology analyzer and with an impedance- and laser-based analyzer with manual differential WBC counts. Results for WBC, neutrophil, and platelet counts and Hct were compared. Sensitivity and specificity of the point-of-care analyzer to detect leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia were calculated. RESULTS: 554 canine and 96 feline blood samples were evaluated. Correlation coefficients for dogs and cats, respectively, were 0.92 and 0.95 for total WBC count, 0.91 and 0.88 for neutrophil count, 0.95 and 0.92 for Hct, and 0.93 and 0.71 for platelet count. Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of the point-of-care analyzer to detect leukopenia were 100% and 75% for dogs and 100% and 68% for cats; to detect neutropenia were 80% and 97% for dogs and 100% and 80% for cats; to detect anemia were 100% and 80% for dogs and 100% and 66% for cats; and to detect thrombocytopenia were 86% and 95% for dogs and 50% and 87% for cats. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The point-of-care analyzer was reliable for monitoring CBCs of dogs and cats receiving chemotherapy. It had good to excellent correlation for WBC and neutrophil counts and Hct and accurately detected leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia. Sensitivity of the analyzer for detecting thrombocytopenia was lower but acceptable.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18479238/