Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Questionnaire to assess quality of life in sick and healthy dogs
By Wojciechowska, Janina I et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2005·Sir James Dunn Animal Welfare Centre and the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Canada·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of a questionnaire regarding nonphysical aspects of quality of life in sick and healthy dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study involving 120 dogs aimed to see if a questionnaire could tell the difference between sick and healthy dogs based on their quality of life. The results showed that both sick and healthy dogs had similar quality of life scores, suggesting that the questionnaire wasn't effective for this purpose. Instead, factors like the dog's environment and how long the owner had the dog seemed to play a bigger role in their quality of life. This means that when assessing a dog's well-being, it's important to consider these other factors rather than just their health status.
People also search for: dog quality of life assessment · how to tell if my dog is happy · factors affecting dog well-being
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of a questionnaire regarding the nonphysical aspects of quality of life (QOL) to differentiate sick and healthy dogs. ANIMALS: 120 dogs. PROCEDURE: The questionnaire was administered by telephone to owners of 120 dogs with appointments at a veterinary teaching hospital. A QOL score was calculated for each dog on the basis of questions relevant to the dog during the 7 days before the interview. Scores were recorded as bar graphs, and linear regression was used to examine the effect of health status and other variables on QOL score. Certain questions were eliminated post hoc, on the basis of defined criteria, and the analyses were repeated. RESULTS: Scores were similar for sick (range, 670% to 93.8%) and healthy (range, 68.0% to 89.8%) dogs. Environment (suburban vs rural) and duration of ownership were significant explanatory variables and accounted for 10.5% of the variation in the QOL score. Eleven questions were eliminated post hoc. The scores derived from the 2 versions of the questionnaire were highly correlated (r = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There was no evidence that the QOL questionnaire could differentiate healthy dogs from sick dogs; environmental and owner factors appeared to be more important.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16173494/