Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Rapid test to detect bacterial urine infection in dogs
By Sutter, Craig M et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2023·William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of a rapid immunoassay for bacteriuria in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 44 dogs with signs of urinary issues, such as malodorous urine, were tested for bacteria in their urine using a new rapid test called RapidBac. The test showed good accuracy, correctly identifying most cases of bacteriuria (bacteria in urine) compared to traditional urine cultures. With a sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 95.5%, it proved to be a helpful tool for vets in deciding whether to start antibiotic treatment. This rapid test could make diagnosing urinary infections quicker and easier for both pets and their owners.
People also search for: dog urinary infection symptoms · RapidBac test for dogs · how to treat dog bacteriuria · dog malodorous urine causes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ability to detect bacteriuria in dogs with a point-of-care test might improve medical care and antimicrobial stewardship. HYPOTHESIS AND OBJECTIVE: A rapid immunoassay (RIA; RapidBac) will provide acceptable sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of bacteriuria. ANIMALS: Forty-four client-owned dogs with a clinical indication for urinalysis and aerobic bacterial urine culture. METHODS: Prospective study. Urine, collected by cystocentesis, was submitted for urinalysis and culture at a diagnostic laboratory. Owners completed an enrollment questionnaire regarding their dogs' clinical signs. The RIA was performed according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Results were compared to culture. RESULTS: Forty-four urine specimens were evaluated from 44 dogs. The sensitivity and specificity of the RIA test to detect bacteriuria compared to urine culture were 81.8% (95% CI, 65.7%-97.9%) and 95.5% (95% CI, 86.8%-99.9%), respectively. For cultures yielding ≥10 CFU/mL, sensitivity increased to 90.0% (95% CI, 76.9%-100%) and specificity was similar at 95.2% (95% CI, 86.1%-99.9%). Malodorous urine, bacteriuria, and pyuria were more likely to be present in dogs with positive RIA or urine culture results compared to dogs with negative results. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The RIA was easy to perform and had good sensitivity and excellent specificity in this group of dogs. The RIA might be a useful screening test for decision-making regarding antimicrobial therapy in dogs with a clinical indication for urine culture. Consideration could be given to amending the International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Disease definition of bacterial cystitis as the presence of signs of lower urinary tract disease together with positive culture or a positive RIA.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37084042/