PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Heartworm treatment effects on heart and inflammation markers in dogs

By Yoon, W-K et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology·2017·College of Veterinary Medicin, South Korea·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of cardiopulmonary and inflammatory markers in dogs with heartworm infection treated using the slow kill method.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with heartworm infection were treated using a slow kill method, which involved giving them a combination of ivermectin and doxycycline. The treatment showed that dogs with mild to moderate heartworm (class I and II) cleared the infection effectively, while those with severe heartworm (class III) still had some health issues even after treatment. Although the levels of certain harmful markers in the blood decreased over time, some dogs with severe infections still had elevated levels. This suggests that while the slow kill method can work for less severe cases, dogs with heavy infections may need additional treatments to fully recover.

People also search for: dog heartworm treatment · slow kill method for heartworm · heartworm symptoms in dogs · doxycycline for heartworm in dogs

Abstract

This study evaluated the changes in the levels of cardiac, hemostatic, and inflammatory biomarkers in 12 dogs with different severities of heartworm infection treated using the slow kill protocol, consisting of 6-10μg/kg of ivermectin and 10mg/kg of doxycycline combination. The serum levels of cardiac troponin-I, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 were measured on the day of diagnosis (D0), after termination of doxycycline administration (D30), after termination of the slow kill treatment (D180), and 10 months after the initiation of therapy (D300). Heartworm antigenemia was cleared in 4/4 class I dogs, 3/4 class II dogs, and 1/4 class III dogs at the end of the therapy (D180), and in 4/4 class I, 4/4 class II, and 1/4 class III dogs at the end of the study (D300). The serum levels of the markers in class I dogs on the day of diagnosis (D0) were within the reference range, while the levels in class II and III dogs were above the reference range. Further, the serum levels of the markers in all dogs decreased significantly at the end of the study (D300), although some markers in class III dogs remained at pathological levels. This study revealed that the slow kill method should be used only as an alternative therapeutic protocol for dogs with low worm burden (class I and II). As the slow kill method alone may not effectively reduce all pathological changes in dogs with heavy worm burden and severe clinical signs (class III), adjuvant therapies including steroids and anti-thromboembolics should be used to minimize the risk of complications.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28917314/