Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Cytology results in cats with conjunctivitis compared to PCR tests
By Hillström, Anna et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2012·University Animal Hospital·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of cytologic findings in feline conjunctivitis.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 88 cats with eye problems called conjunctivitis (inflammation of the eye) had samples taken from their eyes to check for infections. The tests showed that some cats had infections caused by feline herpesvirus (FHV-1), Chlamydophila felis (C felis), or Mycoplasma felis (M felis). While the cytology tests (looking at the cells under a microscope) were helpful in identifying C felis infections, they were not reliable for detecting M felis or FHV-1. This means that if your cat has conjunctivitis, the vet may need to do specific tests to find out the exact cause and the best treatment.
People also search for: cat eye problems · feline conjunctivitis treatment · how to treat cat eye infection · symptoms of cat herpesvirus · cat conjunctivitis causes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cytologic examination of smears prepared from ocular swabs of conjunctiva from cats with conjunctivitis permits identification of the type of inflammation and possibly specific microorganisms. Results of studies of the diagnostic utility of cytology for detection of infectious causes of feline conjunctivitis have been inconsistent. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe cytologic findings in cats with conjunctivitis and to compare those findings with results of PCR analysis for feline herpesvirus (FHV-1), Chlamydophila felis (C felis), and Mycoplasma felis (M felis). METHODS: Conjunctival smears from 88 cats with conjunctivitis and 10 healthy control cats were stained with a Romanowsky stain and evaluated for the type of inflammation and evidence of an infectious agent. PCR analysis for FHV-1, C felis, and M felis was performed. RESULTS: Infectious agents identified by PCR analysis were FHV-1 in 9 cats (10%), C felis in 8 cats (9%), and M felis in 6 cats (7%). Inclusions interpreted as chlamydial inclusions were found in all cytologic smears from cats positive for C felis by PCR analysis and in 3 PCR-negative cats. Inclusions interpreted as Mycoplasma organisms were found in 3 of 6 cats that were PCR-positive for M felis and in 1 PCR-negative cat. FHV-1 inclusion bodies were not detected on cytologic examination. CONCLUSIONS: Cytologic examination can be diagnostic for C felis infection when many typical inclusions are present. Cytologic examination was unreliable in diagnosing M felis infection, and viral inclusions of FHV-1 were not found in specimens stained with Romanowsky stains.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22551068/