Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Signs and survival after intestinal surgery in 35 dogs
By Mouat, Emily E et al.·Published in Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association·2014·Surgery Department, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of data from 35 dogs pertaining to dehiscence following intestinal resection and anastomosis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 35 dogs that had surgery to remove part of their intestines and reconnect the remaining sections were monitored for complications like fluid buildup and infection. Some dogs had a closed-suction drain placed, while others did not. The study found that dogs with drains were more likely to have infections and complications, which could affect their recovery. Dogs that recovered without drains showed better blood and fluid levels after surgery. This suggests that the use of drains may need further investigation to understand their impact on healing.
People also search for: dog intestinal surgery recovery · dog surgery complications · closed-suction drain for dogs
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to evaluate blood and abdominal fluid lactate and glucose, fluid cytology, culture, and volume 24 and 48 hr following intestinal resection and anastomosis in dogs with and without closed-suction drains and to correlate findings with survival. Thirty-five client-owned dogs that underwent intestinal resection and anastomosis were prospectively enrolled in the study. Abdominal fluid was submitted for culture at surgery and again 24 hr postoperatively. Twenty-four and 48 hr postoperatively, blood and abdominal fluid glucose and lactate were measured and fluid was submitted for cytology. Abdominal fluid was collected either from a closed-suction drain or by abdominocentesis. Patients were followed either for 14 days or until death. Comparisons were made based on development of dehiscence and presence or absence of a drain. Patients with dehiscence were more likely to have positive cultures at 24 hr and to have had more bowel resected. Surviving patients without drains had significantly smaller differences in blood and fluid glucose and lactate both 24 and 48 hr postoperatively than surviving patients with drains. The significant differences identified between patients with and without drains suggests a need for further research into the effect of drains on abdominal fluid values.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24855087/