Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Blood tests to check shunt closure after dog surgery
By Devriendt, Nausikaa et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2022·Small Animal Department·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of different blood tests in dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts to assess shunt closure after surgical treatment.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 20 dogs with a condition called extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (EHPSS), which can cause serious health issues, underwent surgery to correct the problem. After the surgery, veterinarians used various blood tests to check if the shunt was successfully closed. The best results came from a combination of tests, particularly one that measured serum hyaluronic acid (SHA) and another involving lidocaine. These tests were very effective in indicating whether the shunt was closed, but imaging was still necessary to confirm the results.
People also search for: dog EHPSS surgery outcome · blood tests for dog liver shunt · how to diagnose portosystemic shunt in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of different individual and combined blood tests to assess extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (EHPSS) closure after gradual attenuation of EHPSS in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical prospective study. ANIMALS: Twenty client-owned dogs with EHPSS. METHODS: Fasting ammonia (FA), preprandial, postprandial, and paired serum bile acids (SBA), the lidocaine/monoethylglycylxylidide (L/MEGX) test, and serum hyaluronic acid (SHA) were performed at diagnosis, and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Transsplenic portal scintigraphy was performed to determine EHPSS closure 3 months postoperatively. Their sensitivity and specificity in determining shunt closure postoperatively were calculated. RESULTS: When assessing a single blood parameter, FA had the highest specificity (100%), whereas SHA and MEGX measured 15 min after lidocaine administration (T15) had the highest sensitivity (96.9% and 96.2%, respectively) for determining shunt closure postoperatively. The most promising blood test combinations were SHA (sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 81.8%), combined with the L/MEGX test (MEGX at T15: sensitivity 100%, specificity 72.4%) or the L/MEGX test (MEGX at T15) combined with either FA (sensitivity 100%, specificity 82.8%) or postprandial SBA (sensitivity 100%, specificity 81.5%). CONCLUSION: Both SHA and the L/MEGX test were sensitive tests for determining shunt closure after gradual attenuation of EHPSS. Test performances could even be improved by combining these tests with each other or with traditional tests such as FA or postprandial SBA. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Although SHA and the L/MEGX test are sensitive blood tests for determining EHPSS closure, especially when combined with traditional blood tests, imaging is still needed to confirm EHPSS closure.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35729849/