PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Evaluation of different models to segregate Pelibuey and Katahdin ewes into resistant or susceptible to gastrointestinal nematodes.

Journal:
Tropical animal health and production
Year:
2016
Authors:
Palomo-Couoh, Jovanny Gaspar et al.
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia

Abstract

This study evaluated four models based on the number of eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) to segregate Pelibuey or Katahdin ewes during the lactation period into resistant or susceptible to gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) in tropical Mexico. Nine hundred and thirty EPG counts of Pelibuey ewes and 710 of Katahdin ewes were obtained during 10&#xa0;weeks of lactation. Ewes were segregated into resistant, intermediate and susceptible, using their individual EPG every week. Then, data of every ewe was used to provide a reference classification, which included all the EPG values of each animal. Then, four models were evaluated against such reference. Model 1 was based on the 10-week mean EPG count&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;2 SE. Models 2, 3 and 4 were based on the mean EPG count of 10, 5 and 2&#xa0;weeks of lactation. The cutoff points for the segregation of ewe in those three models were the quartiles &#x2264;Q1 (low elimination) and &#x2265;Q3 (high elimination). In all the models evaluated, the ewes classified as resistant had lower EPG than intermediates and susceptible (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) while ewes classified as susceptible had higher EPG than intermediate and resistant (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). According to J Youden test, models presented concordance with the reference group (>70&#xa0;%). Model 3 tended to show higher sensitivity and specificity with the reference data, but no difference was found with other models. The present study showed that the phenotypic marker EPG might serve to identify and segregate populations of adult ewes during the lactation period. All models used served to segregate Pelibuey and Katahdin ewes into resistant, intermediate and susceptible. The model 3 (mean of 5&#xa0;weeks) could be used because it required less sampling effort without losing sensitivity or specificity in the segregation of animals. However, model 2 (mean of 2&#xa0;weeks) was less labour-intensive.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27525647/