PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How to detect forelimb lameness in dogs walking

By Granström, Miriam Kjörk et al.·Published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica·2024·University Animal Hospital·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of forelimb gait variation overground at a walk in sound and lame dogs using a combination of diagnostic techniques.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with forelimb lameness due to elbow osteoarthritis was compared to healthy dogs to see how their walking patterns differed. The study found that while the healthy dogs showed consistent walking patterns over time, the lame dogs had noticeable differences in their gait. A new method called symmetry squares showed promise in detecting lameness, which could help vets assess dogs that are lame in both front legs. This could lead to better treatment plans for dogs with complex lameness issues.

People also search for: dog limping treatment · elbow osteoarthritis in dogs · how to tell if my dog is lame

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis is increasingly practised as a part of lameness evaluation in dogs. The aim of this study was to examine the normal short- and long-term variation in forelimb gait in sound control dogs (CD) at a walk using seven selected variables of objective kinetic and kinematic gait analyses. Also, to compare the findings in CD to a group of forelimb lame dogs with elbow osteoarthritis (OAD). An additional aim was to test a kinetic based graphic method for lameness detection; symmetry squares (SS). A prospective longitudinal study was carried out on client owned CD and OAD. Clinical and orthopaedic evaluations were performed to ensure soundness and detect and grade lameness. Seven kinetic and kinematic variables and SS were tested for lameness evaluation. The CD were divided into two subgroups, CD1 and CD2, and examined twice: CD1 with two months interval and CD2 with 3-4 h interval. The OAD group was evaluated once and compared to the CD groups' first examination. RESULTS: Thirteen CD and 19 OAD were included. For CD1 and CD2, there were no significant differences in any examined variable between examination occasions. Total peak force/impulse symmetry and fore-hind peak force/impulse symmetry differed significantly between OAD and CD. Symmetry squares had a 74% agreement to subjective orthopaedic evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: In CD, no difference in the examined variables was seen between examination occasions. Four out of seven objective variables differed significantly between CD and OAD. The graphic SS method might have diagnostic potential for lameness detection, making it possible to detect a shift from lame to non-lame limbs. Potentially, this might be especially helpful in bilaterally lame dogs, which often represent a clinical challenge in lameness evaluation.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38902837/