PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Fluid treatment effects on tissue oxygen in dogs with hemorrhagic

By Cooper, Edward S et al.Ā·Published in The Journal of traumaĀ·2009Ā·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United StatesĀ·View original on PubMed →

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of hyperviscous fluid resuscitation in a canine model of hemorrhagic shock: a randomized, controlled study.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs undergoing surgery experienced hemorrhagic shock, which is a severe drop in blood pressure due to blood loss. They were given either a standard fluid treatment or a thicker fluid solution to see if it would help improve their blood flow and oxygen levels. Unfortunately, the thicker solution did not lead to better outcomes in terms of blood pressure or oxygen delivery to tissues, even though it did change some blood properties. The study suggests that simply increasing fluid viscosity isn't enough to help dogs in this critical condition.

People also search for: dog hemorrhagic shock treatment Ā· fluid resuscitation for dogs Ā· thick fluid for dog blood pressure

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhancing plasma viscosity during fluid resuscitation results in vasodilation and improved microvascular perfusion in rodents subjected to hemorrhagic shock. We hypothesized that resuscitation with hyperviscous lactated Ringer's solution (hyperLRS) would result in improved tissue oxygenation and acid-base values in hemorrhaged dogs. METHODS: Twelve dogs were anesthetized and splenectomized. Vascular catheterization was performed, and tissue oxygen probes were placed in the jejunal serosa and skeletal muscle to assess macro- and microhemodynamic parameters. Baseline (BL) and posthemorrhage data were obtained. After 1 hour of hemorrhagic shock (mean arterial pressure [MAP] 30-40 mm Hg), treatment groups (n = 6) were administered bolus LRS or hyperLRS, and then received sufficient LRS to achieve and maintain an MAP between 60 mm Hg and 70 mm Hg. Data were obtained at 10, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after fluid resuscitation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between LRS or hyperLRS groups at BL or posthemorrhage. Blood and plasma viscosity were significantly increased by the administration of hyperLRS at all time points postresuscitation compared with LRS. Significantly more fluid was required to maintain MAP, and vascular hindrance was consistently lower in dogs administered hyperLRS versus LRS, suggesting viscosity-induced vasodilation. Central and mesenteric venous oxygen saturations were significantly decreased, whereas lactate and oxygen extraction ratios were significantly increased after hyperLRS administration compared with LRS. The tissue oxygen tension was similar in dogs administered hyperLRS or LRS. CONCLUSIONS: A hyperviscous balanced electrolyte solution did not improve hemodynamic parameters, tissue oxygen tension, or acid-base values despite evidence for viscosity-induced vasodilation.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19430240/