PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Serum cortisol levels predict survival in critically ill dogs

By Swales, Harry et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2020·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of serum cortisol concentration as a prognostic indicator for nonsurvival to hospital discharge in critically ill dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study looked at 229 critically ill dogs to see if measuring their serum cortisol levels could help predict whether they would survive their hospital stay. The results showed that dogs that did not survive had higher cortisol levels (average of 8.5 µg/dL) compared to those that were discharged alive (average of 4.5 µg/dL). The researchers found that a cortisol level above 7.6 µg/dL was a strong indicator of a poor prognosis. This means that measuring cortisol can be a helpful tool for veterinarians when assessing the likelihood of recovery in seriously ill dogs.

People also search for: dog hospital discharge prognosis · high cortisol levels in dogs · critically ill dog survival rates

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether serum cortisol (SC) concentration is a useful prognostic indicator for survival versus nonsurvival to hospital discharge in critically ill dogs. ANIMALS: 229 client-owned dogs. PROCEDURES: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to identify critically ill dogs that were hospitalized between January 2010 and May 2018 and that had SC concentrations measured ≤ 3 days after admission. Results for SC concentrations were compared for dogs grouped by survival versus nonsurvival to hospital discharge, with versus without sepsis, and other variables of interest. The predictive value of SC concentration for nonsurvival to hospital discharge was assessed (OR, sensitivity, and specificity) for cutoffs determined from a ROC curve or reference limit. RESULTS: Median SC concentration was higher in dogs that did not survive to hospital discharge (8.5 μg/dL; interquartile [25th to 75th percentile] range, 4.8 to 11.8 μg/dL), compared with concentration in those that were discharged alive (4.5 μg/dL; interquartile range, 2.5 to 6.9 μg/dL). The area under the ROC curve was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.81) for SC concentration predicting nonsurvival. The calculated optimum cutoff of SC concentration was 7.6 μg/dL, at which the OR, sensitivity, and specificity for nonsurvival were 5.4 (95% CI, 2.7 to 10.9), 58%, and 80%, respectively. Alternatively, when the upper reference limit for SC concentration (5.8 μg/dL) was used as the cutoff, the OR, sensitivity, and specificity for nonsurvival were 3.6 (95% CI, 1.8 to 7.1), 67%, and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicated that SC concentration could be used as part of an overall assessment of prognosis in critically ill dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32301661/