Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Serum NT-pCNP blood test for diagnosing sepsis in dogs
By DeClue, A E et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2011·Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of serum NT-pCNP as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for sepsis in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 112 dogs, including 29 with sepsis, were studied to find a reliable blood test for diagnosing sepsis, which is a serious infection. Researchers measured a substance called NT-pCNP in their blood and found that it could help distinguish dogs with sepsis from those with other inflammatory conditions or healthy dogs. While the test showed good accuracy overall, it wasn't as effective for dogs with infections in the abdomen. Unfortunately, the NT-pCNP levels did not predict survival in dogs with sepsis.
People also search for: dog sepsis symptoms · blood test for dog infection · NT-pCNP in dogs · how to tell if my dog has sepsis · dog abdominal infection treatment
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a need for diagnostic biomarkers that can rapidly differentiate dogs with sepsis from dogs with noninfectious forms of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (NSIRS). OBJECTIVES: To compare serum NT-pCNP concentrations among dogs with various forms of sepsis, NSIRS, and healthy controls and to evaluate the use of serum NT-pCNP for the diagnosis of various forms of sepsis in dogs. ANIMALS: One hundred and twelve dogs including 63 critically ill dogs (sepsis n = 29; NSIRS n = 34) and 49 healthy control dogs. METHODS: Prospective clinical investigation. Serum samples were collected for NT-pCNP measurement from dogs with sepsis or NSIRS within 24 hours of intensive care unit admission or at the time of presentation for healthy dogs. Dogs with sepsis were subclassified based on the anatomic region of infection. Serum NT-pCNP concentrations were compared among sepsis, NSIRS and healthy groups as well as among sepsis subgroups. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for identifying dogs with sepsis were determined. RESULTS: Using a cut-off value of 10.1 pmol/L, AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of NT-pCNP for differentiating dogs with sepsis from dogs with NSIRS or healthy control dogs were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.85), 65.5% (45.7-82.1%), and 89.2% (80.4-94.9%), respectively. Serum NT-pCNP had poor sensitivity for peritoneal sources of sepsis; AUC [0.92 (0.81-1.0)], sensitivity [94% (71-100%)], and specificity [89% (80-95%)] improved when these dogs were excluded. Serum NT-pCNP concentration was not associated with survival in the sepsis group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Serum NT-pCNP is a promising diagnostic biomarker for sepsis but is a poor indicator of septic peritonitis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21457321/