PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Serum protein tests in dogs positive for vector-borne diseases

By Jornet-Rius, Oriol et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2024·Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals Facultat de Veterin&#xe0, Spain·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation in dogs seropositive for various vector-borne pathogens.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs that tested positive for various tick-borne diseases had their blood proteins analyzed to check for abnormalities. Most of the dogs showed a common type of protein increase, but only two had signs of a specific abnormal protein that could indicate a serious condition. The study helped identify different patterns in blood proteins based on the type of infection, which could assist veterinarians in diagnosing and treating these diseases more effectively.

People also search for: dog tick-borne disease symptoms · dog blood protein test results · what does it mean if my dog has abnormal proteins

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Canine vector-borne diseases (VBDs) induce non-specific dysproteinemias, detectable by serum protein electrophoresis (SPE). VBDs have been reported to induce a monoclonal gammopathy pattern. Monoclonal gammopathies are commonly the result of paraprotein (M-protein) produced by an immunoglobulin-secreting neoplasm. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to characterize and compare SPE and immunofixation (IF) changes, evaluate the performance of previously identified SPE and IF interpretative criteria, and identify M-proteins in a cohort of dogs seropositive for a VBD and with an unknown history for an immunoglobulin-secreting neoplasm. METHODS: A total of 143 serum samples from dogs that tested seropositive for different vector-borne pathogens were assessed by SPE. Cases with abnormal globulin fractions were further characterized by IF. Protein fraction and IF labeling results were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's multiple comparisons and principal component analysis (PCA). RESULTS: IF was performed in 112 VBD-seropositive samples with dysproteinemia evaluated by SPE. Most (84/112, 75%) had a polyclonal expansion. Only two dogs had findings suggestive of an M-protein when considering both SPE and immunofixation. PCA clustered E.canis/A.phagocytophilum and B.gibsoni/CM.haematoparvum groups with relatively more γ-globulins than albumin and α-globulins, and the B.gibsoni/CM.haematoparvum group with more prominent IgA and IgM labeling than IgG labeling. Additionally, D.immitis clustered with more prominent β-globulins than γ-globulins and more IgG4 than IgG-FC. CONCLUSIONS: The previously derived interpretative criteria suggested an M-protein in very few VBD-seropositive dogs. PCA identified SPE and immunofixation pattern differences between dogs seropositive for different infectious agents.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39528734/