Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Risks and outcomes after large intestine surgery in dogs
By Latimer, Christian R et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2019·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of short-term outcomes and potential risk factors for death and intestinal dehiscence following full-thickness large intestinal incisions in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Ninety dogs that underwent surgery for large intestinal issues were monitored for complications after their operations. About 10% of these dogs experienced a serious complication called intestinal dehiscence, where the surgical site reopens, and 17% did not survive their hospital stay. Factors like not eating before surgery, low blood sugar, and certain blood changes increased the risk of death. Additionally, dogs with previous colon injuries or infections were more likely to have complications. While the rates of these issues were lower than expected, the study suggests that careful monitoring and treatment are crucial for recovery.
People also search for: dog intestinal surgery complications · why is my dog not eating after surgery · dog surgery recovery tips
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine complication rates for dogs in which full-thickness large intestinal incisions were performed, assess potential risk factors for death during hospitalization and for intestinal dehiscence following these surgeries, and report short-term mortality rates for these patients. ANIMALS: 90 dogs. PROCEDURES: Medical records of 4 veterinary referral hospitals were reviewed to identify dogs that underwent large intestinal surgery requiring full-thickness incisions. Signalment, history, clinicopathologic data, medical treatments, surgical procedures, complications, and outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics were calculated; data were analyzed for association with survival to discharge (with logistic regression analysis) and postoperative intestinal dehiscence (with Fisher exact or Wilcoxon rank sum tests). RESULTS: Overall 7-day postoperative intestinal dehiscence and mortality rates were 9 of 90 (10%) and 15 of 90 (17%). Dogs with preoperative anorexia, hypoglycemia, or neutrophils with toxic changes and those that received preoperative antimicrobial treatment had greater odds of death than did dogs without these findings. Preexisting colon trauma or dehiscence, preexisting peritonitis, administration of blood products, administration of > 2 classes of antimicrobials, positive microbial culture results for a surgical sample, and open abdominal management of peritonitis after surgery were associated with development of intestinal dehiscence. Five of 9 dogs with intestinal dehiscence died or were euthanized. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Factors associated with failure to survive to discharge were considered suggestive of sepsis. Results suggested the dehiscence rate for full-thickness large intestinal incisions may not be as high as previously reported, but several factors may influence this outcome and larger, longer-term studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31573871/