Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How to detect sepsis in dogs with pyometra using SIRS and qSOFA scores
By Esra Çolakoğlu, Hatice & Karaca, Ecenur·Published in Theriogenology·2025·Ankara University·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of SIRS and qSOFA in the diagnosis of sepsis in dogs with pyometra.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with pyometra, a serious infection of the uterus, showed signs like depression, weakness, and fever. Researchers tested two scoring systems, SIRS and qSOFA, to see which was better at identifying sepsis (a severe infection) in these dogs. They found that the SIRS score was highly accurate, correctly identifying 95% of cases, while the qSOFA score was slightly less reliable, identifying 65% of cases. Both scores were used before surgery and again a few days after, helping vets determine the best treatment approach. The study suggests that using the SIRS score can help vets quickly diagnose and treat dogs with pyometra at risk of sepsis.
People also search for: dog pyometra symptoms · sepsis in dogs treatment · SIRS score in dogs · qSOFA score for dogs · dog infection after surgery
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the usability of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scores developed for the rapid, reliable and accurate detection of sepsis and organ damage in dogs with pyometra. In the study, dogs with clinical findings (depression, anorexia, weakness, polyuria, polydipsia, fever), diagnosed with pyometra as a result of gynecological, clinical and laboratory examinations and treated surgically (n = 20) were included in the pyometra group. Healthy dogs that underwent routine ovariohysterectomy (n = 20) were added to the control group. In both groups, complete blood and serum biochemistry (aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, albumin, creatine kinase) analyses were performed at the time of diagnosis in the preoperative period. SIRS and qSOFA scores were measured in both groups before surgery and on the third postoperative day. According to the data obtained as a result of the study, the sensitivity and selectivity of qSOFA score in the diagnosis of pyometra were determined to be 65 % and 100 %, respectively. SIRS score was found to have a sensitivity of 95 % and a selectivity of 100 %. The AUC values of SIRS and qSOFA scores were determined as 0.985 and 0.896, respectively. These results indicate that the qSOFA score has good performance in the diagnosis of pyometra, but lower accuracy than the SIRS score, and the SIRS score has high accuracy in the diagnosis of dogs with pyometra. SIRS is a more accurate and reliable screening tool in the diagnosis of dogs with pyometra at risk of sepsis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40184938/