PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Accuracy of four dog pancreatitis tests compared in sick dogs

By Cridge, H et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2018·Department of Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of SNAP cPL, Spec cPL, VetScan cPL Rapid Test, and Precision PSL Assays for the Diagnosis of Clinical Pancreatitis in Dogs.

Species:
dog
Pancreatitis in dogsStomach & digestionDogs

Plain-English summary

Fifty dogs showing signs of gastrointestinal issues were tested for pancreatitis using four different diagnostic tests. The tests included SNAP cPL, Spec cPL, VetScan cPL Rapid Test, and Precision PSL, which were compared to a clinical suspicion score from veterinary experts. All tests showed good agreement, with sensitivities ranging from about 74% to 100%, but none could definitively diagnose pancreatitis without additional clinical signs. This means that while these tests can help, they should be used alongside a veterinarian's assessment for an accurate diagnosis.

People also search for: dog pancreatitis symptoms · pancreatitis test for dogs · how to diagnose pancreatitis in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The sensitivity, specificity, and agreement of 4 diagnostic assays (SNAP canine pancreatic lipase (cPL), specific cPL (Spec cPL), VetScan cPL Rapid Test, and Precision PSL) for pancreatitis in dogs have not been directly compared. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To determine the level of agreement among each of the 4 assays and a clinical suspicion score, level of agreement among the assays, and sensitivity and specificity of each assay in a clinically relevant patient group. ANIMALS: Fifty client-owned dogs with clinical signs of gastrointestinal disease. METHODS: Prospective study. History, physical examination, complete blood count, serum biochemistry, abdominal ultrasound examination, and the 4 diagnostic assays for pancreatitis were performed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine the level of agreement between each assay and a clinical suspicion score determined by a panel of 5 board-certified veterinary internists. RESULTS: The ICC between the clinical suspicion score and the 4 assays were SNAP cPL, 0.61; Spec cPL, 0.68; VetScan cPL Rapid Test, 0.68; and Precision PSL, 0.60. The sensitivities of the assays ranged from 73.9 to 100.0%, whereas the specificities were SNAP cPL, 71.1-77.8%; Spec cPL, 74.1-81.1%; VetScan cPL Rapid Test, 76.9-83.8%; and Precision PSL, 64.0-74.3%. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: A good to excellent level of agreement was demonstrated among the 4 assays. The previously unreported sensitivity and specificity of the VetScan cPL Rapid Test were 73.9-83.3% and 76.9-83.8%, respectively. Results of any of the 4 diagnostic assays alone, in the absence of supporting clinical findings, are insufficient to establish a diagnosis of clinical pancreatitis in dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29424454/