Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Soft palate thickness in brachycephalic dogs after two palate
By Timmermans, Joep et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2026·Small Animal Department·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of soft palate thickness in brachycephalic dogs 3 months after folded flap palatoplasty versus standard staphylectomy.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 20 brachycephalic dogs (like Bulldogs and Pugs) with breathing problems underwent surgery to correct their airways. They were split into two groups: one had a folded flap palatoplasty (FFP) and the other a standard staphylectomy (STS). Three months later, most dogs in the STS group showed significant improvement in their ability to exercise, while the FFP group had mixed results. Both surgeries helped reduce the size of the soft palate, but the thickness measurements didn’t show a clear advantage for either method. Overall, both types of surgery led to better breathing for the dogs.
People also search for: brachycephalic dog breathing problems · folded flap palatoplasty recovery · staphylectomy for dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the soft palate thickness in brachycephalic dogs 3 months after performing folded flap palatoplasty (FFP) or standard staphylectomy (STS). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. ANIMALS: Twenty client-owned dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome undergoing corrective multilevel upper airway surgery. METHODS: Clinical examination consisted of an exercise tolerance test (ETT) and evaluation of the oropharynx and larynx. Computed tomography (CT) of the skull was performed to measure the length (LEN), rostral thickness (RTH), and middle thickness (MTH) of the soft palate, with calculations of the longitudinal cross-sectional area (CSA) and palatal volume (VOL). Dogs were assigned to undergo FFP (n = 10) or STS (n = 10). Examinations were repeated 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The ETT score 3 months postoperatively improved in 6/8 dogs in the FFP group and in 10/10 dogs in the STS group. Shortening of the soft palate resulted in reduction of the median LEN, CSA, and VOL after both FFP and STS. Median rostral thickness increased by 8.2% (IQR -2.0 to 20.6) after FFP and by 10.1% (IQR 1.0 to 15.7) after STS. Median middle thickness increased by 7.9% (IQR -5.0 to 20.9) after FFP and decreased by 16.9% (IQR -27.0 to -0.4) after STS. CONCLUSION: Folded flap palatoplasty did not result in decreased soft palate thickness in the dogs in this study when evaluated by CT 3 months postoperatively. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Folded flap palatoplasty and STS both resulted in postoperative clinical improvement. Future studies, including a CT immediately postoperatively, could indicate whether the soft palate is thinned immediately after FFP.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40862642/