Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Heart disease blood tests for cats with heart muscle problems
By Abdelhaleem, Salma W et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2025·Department of Clinical Pathology·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of some cardiac biomarkers in cats with primary and secondary cardiomyopathies.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 78 cats with heart issues were tested for various cardiac biomarkers to help diagnose heart disease more affordably than with echocardiography. The study found that certain markers, like NT-proBNP, cTnI, and CK-MB, were significantly higher in cats with heart disease compared to healthy cats. These tests could help veterinarians identify heart problems early on, even without expensive imaging. The results suggest that using these biomarkers can improve diagnosis and treatment planning for cats with heart conditions.
People also search for: cat heart disease symptoms · feline cardiomyopathy diagnosis · NT-proBNP test for cats
Abstract
Cardiomyopathies (CMs) are one of the most predominant disorders in cats. Cardiac biomarkers can offer an economical alternative for the initial diagnosis of CM in comparison to the more costly echocardiography. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), and galectin-3 (Gal-3) in detection of feline CMs. The study included 78 cats classified into 3 groups based on clinical examination, echocardiography, and analysis of serum cardiac biomarkers, renal function, and total thyroxine. Group I (apparently healthy cats, n = 16), group II (cats with primary CM, n = 37), and group III (cats with secondary CM, n = 25). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify area under the curve and the corresponding cut-off value for each cardiac biomarker. Pearson's correlation coefficient was also assessed. NT-proBNP, CK-MB, and Gal-3 were increased in groups II and III compared to group I. Meanwhile, cTnI was higher in group II than group III and MR-proADM was increased in group II only. NT-proBNP, cTnI, and CK-MB revealed moderate to strong positive correlations and the best diagnostic accuracy when compared to echocardiography, showcasing the benefits of multi-biomarker use. In conclusion, NT-proBNP, cTnI, CK-MB, and CK-RI exhibited the highest efficacy, and cTnI was able to statistically distinguish between primary and secondary CMs. In the absence of echocardiography, these biomarkers could be taken into account during the preliminary assessment for CM.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40983221/