Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Immune cells in skin of dogs with and without leishmaniosis infection
By Hernandez-Bures, Andrea et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2021·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of the cutaneous inflammatory cells in dogs with leishmaniosis and in dogs without the disease that were naturally infected by Leishmania infantum (syn. L. chagasi).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with moderate to severe leishmaniosis (a disease caused by a parasite) showed significant skin inflammation, with higher numbers of certain immune cells in their skin compared to healthy dogs. The study found that these dogs had more neutrophils, histiocytes, and T lymphocytes, which are all signs of an immune response. In contrast, dogs that were infected but did not show symptoms had normal-looking skin with no increased immune cells. This suggests that while some dogs can carry the parasite without showing signs of disease, those with leishmaniosis have a distinct immune response in their skin.
People also search for: dog leishmaniosis symptoms · dog skin inflammation treatment · why is my dog scratching · leishmaniosis in dogs care · immune response in dogs skin
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Canine leishmaniosis (CanL) is associated with an aberrant cutaneous immune response. Few studies have compared cutaneous immune cells among dogs with leishmaniosis or infected without leishmaniosis, and noninfected dogs. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the number of neutrophils, histiocytes, T lymphocytes, T-bet-positive, GATA3-positive, FoxP3-positive and interleukin (IL)-17-positive cells, in lesional (Group A) and normal-looking (Group B) skin of nine dogs with stage II/III leishmaniosis; in normal-looking PCR-positive (Group C; n = 6) or PCR-negative (Group D; n = 6) skin of infected dogs; and in the normal-looking skin of 12 noninfected dogs (Group E). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Diagnosis of CanL considered clinical signs, clinicopathological abnormalities, detection of Leishmania amastigotes in lymph nodes, and/or bone marrow and positive serological results. Paraffin-embedded skin biopsies were processed for routine immunofluorescence and positive cells were identified using commercially available anti-canine antibodies. RESULTS: In Group A, there was a significantly higher number of neutrophils (P < 0.001), histiocytes (P = 0.012), T lymphocytes (P = 0.011), GATA3-positive (P = 0.02) and IL-17A-positive (P = 0.002) cells compared to Group E. In Group B, there was a significantly higher number of histiocytes (P = 0.02), T lymphocytes (P = 0.004), GATA3-positive (P = 0.006) and FoxP3-positive (P = 0.028) cells compared to Group E. There was no difference in between groups A and B and between groups C or D and E. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In the lesional and/or normal-looking skin of dogs with moderate/severe CanL there is an infiltration of neutrophils, histiocytes, T lymphocytes, GATA3-, FoxP3- and IL17A-positive cells. By contrast, the number of these cells is not increased in the normal-looking skin of infected dogs without CanL compared to the skin of noninfected dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33368749/