PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Delta neutrophil index test for diagnosing sepsis in dogs

By Troìa, R et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2017·Department of Veterinary Medical Science, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of the delta neutrophil index from an automated blood cell analyser in septic dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with sepsis were evaluated to see if a specific blood test called the delta neutrophil index (DNI) could help diagnose their condition and predict outcomes. The study found that dogs with sepsis had higher DNI levels compared to healthy dogs and those with a different blood condition. However, the DNI did not reliably predict which dogs would survive or not. Overall, while the DNI showed promise in identifying sepsis and predicting septic shock, more research is needed to confirm its usefulness in clinical settings.

People also search for: dog sepsis symptoms · delta neutrophil index in dogs · septic shock treatment in dogs

Abstract

Immature granulocytes (IG) are a marker of severe inflammatory states in human beings and animals, and have been linked to a diagnosis of sepsis and poor prognosis. The delta neutrophil index (DNI), automatically calculated by a haematological analyser, provides an estimate of circulating IG. In particular, an increased DNI value has been associated with the severity of sepsis, and mortality, in critically ill human beings. The aims of this study were to determine the DNI reference interval (RI) in healthy dogs, and to evaluate its diagnostic and prognostic significance in dogs with sepsis. A total of 118 dogs with sepsis undergoing a complete blood cell count (CBC) at the time of hospital admission were included retrospectively. Dogs with sepsis were compared to 20 dogs with primary immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia (IMHA) and 99 healthy controls. The DNI RI was set from 0 to 9.2%. The DNI was significantly higher in dogs with sepsis compared to dogs with IMHA and healthy dogs (P<0.001), and significantly higher in dogs with septic shock compared to septic dogs without circulatory failure (P<0.03). No differences were detected between survivors (78/118) and non-survivors (40/118). Septic dogs with a DNI above the RI had significantly higher frequencies of IG and toxic neutrophil changes on manual blood smear evaluation (P=0.03 and P<0.001, respectively). The DNI had a fair performance in identifying dogs with sepsis in this population and predicted septic shock. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate DNI measurement in dogs and to test its clinical utility.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29208210/