PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Heartworm drug resistance gene study in Ontario dogs 2015-2016

By Engell, Dylan et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports·2025·Ontario Veterinary College, Canada·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of the drug-resistance genotypes of Dirofilaria immitis infections in Ontario dogs (2015-2016).

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study looked at heartworm infections in dogs from Ontario, finding that a few had genetic markers indicating resistance to common heartworm preventives. Out of 39 dogs tested, only 3 showed signs of these resistant strains, and just one had both markers linked to resistance. Interestingly, there was no difference in resistance between dogs that had received heartworm prevention and those that had not. This suggests that the resistant infections were likely acquired locally, rather than from travel. It's important for dog owners to stay vigilant about heartworm prevention, even in areas where it seems effective.

People also search for: dog heartworm prevention · heartworm resistance in dogs · Ontario dog heartworm treatment

Abstract

For more than 3 decades, macrocyclic lactone (ML) heartworm preventives have been extremely effective at preventing Dirofilaria immitis infections in dogs. Reports of loss of efficacy (LOE) of the MLs in the early 2000s led to in-depth research which identified the presence of resistant strains of D. immitis in the Southeast United States. Detailed genetic analysis of such parasites identified genetic markers for resistance. In order to evaluate the prevalence of these markers in Ontario infections, microfilariae (MF) from 39 Ontario dogs, 22 from a ML-naïve population and 17 from a ML-exposed population, were collected in 2015-2016, analyzed and compared. The ML-naïve population comprised stray dogs from an area near Caledonia, Ontario where heartworm preventives have historically been rarely used. The ML-exposed population comprised client-owned dogs from veterinary practices across Ontario where preventives are commonly used. Overall, MF with resistant markers (two single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) were found in 3/39 dogs. However, in only one of those infections were both SNPs associated with ML resistance present. There was no significant difference in prevalence of these genetic markers for resistance between the ML-naïve population and the ML-exposed population of dogs (n = 22 genotyped and n = 17 genotyped, respectively). Despite the low prevalence of infections with ML-resistant genotypes, the fact that none of the dogs in this study had traveled outside Ontario suggests that the infections with ML-resistant genotypes were locally acquired.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40967688/