Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Preventing acid reflux after surgery in dogs with maropitant
By Jones, Ciaran T & Fransson, Boel A·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2019·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of the effectiveness of preoperative administration of maropitant citrate and metoclopramide hydrochloride in preventing postoperative clinical gastroesophageal reflux in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 93 dogs undergoing surgery were monitored for signs of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) after their procedures. Some dogs received preoperative medications called maropitant and metoclopramide to try to prevent GER, but the study found that these medications did not significantly reduce the occurrence of GER compared to dogs that did not receive them. Factors that increased the risk of GER included being male, being overweight, having gastrointestinal surgery, and needing certain medications after surgery. More research is needed to find better ways to prevent GER in dogs after surgery.
People also search for: dog surgery reflux prevention · gastroesophageal reflux in dogs · maropitant for dogs after surgery
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prophylactic effectiveness of preoperative administration of maropitant citrate and metoclopramide hydrochloride in preventing postoperative clinical gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in dogs and to identify risk factors for clinical postoperative GER in dogs. ANIMALS: 93 client-owned dogs undergoing surgery at the Washington State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital between March 2016 and February 2017. PROCEDURES: Dogs were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (preoperatively received maropitant and metoclopramide) or the control group (did not preoperatively receive maropitant and metoclopramide). After surgery, all dogs were recovered and monitored, and occurrences of GER were noted. The prophylactic effectiveness of maropitant and metoclopramide was evaluated, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with postoperative clinical GER in dogs. RESULTS: No meaningful difference in the incidence of clinical GER during the postoperative period was detected between the control and intervention groups. Results indicated that variables associated with significantly increased odds of postoperative clinical GER included the male sex (OR, 9.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 195.0), an overweight BCS (OR, 12.3; 95% CI, 2.1 to 135.1), gastrointestinal surgery (OR, 30.5; 95% CI, 3.0 to 786.9), and requirement for a dexmedetomidine constant rate infusion after surgery (OR, 9.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 212.5). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Findings indicated that incidence of clinical GER during the postoperative period was not lower for dogs that received preoperative prophylactic administration of metoclopramide and maropitant, compared with incidence dogs that did not receive the prophylactic treatment. Further research is required into alternative measures to prevent postoperative clinical GER in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31355727/