Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Using infrared thermography to tell dog skin tumors apart
By Dos Santos, Keylla Hörbe Steffen et al.·Published in Research in veterinary science·2025·Programa de Pó, Brazil·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of the reliability of the use of infrared thermography in the categorization of tumors in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A 10-year-old dog with various skin tumors was studied to see if infrared thermography (IRT) could help tell the difference between benign and malignant tumors. The researchers found that the temperature of the skin over malignant tumors was lower than that of healthy skin and transitional areas. While malignant and non-neoplastic tumors had slightly higher temperatures than benign tumors, the differences weren't significant. Overall, IRT showed promise as a tool for distinguishing between different types of skin tumors in dogs, with healthy skin being warmer than affected areas.
People also search for: dog skin tumor types · infrared thermography for dog tumors · how to tell if a dog tumor is cancerous
Abstract
Infrared thermography (IRT) has been explored as a complementary diagnostic tool in dogs, particularly in oncology. However, few studies have assessed its applicability to non-neoplastic skin tumors or compared thermal patterns between malignant and benign tumors. This study evaluated IRT as a method for distinguishing thermal patterns between healthy skin and cutaneous tumoral lesions in dogs. A total of 103 skin lesions from 57 dogs, either male or female, of different breeds, and average age of 10 years, were analyzed and classified into benign neoplasms, malignant neoplasms, and non-neoplastic tumors. Mean surface temperatures were obtained for three areas: tumoral (El1), transitional (LiM), and healthy adjacent skin (El2). Rectal temperature was also assessed using a digital thermometer. Results showed that, in the malignant neoplasm group, the temperature of El1 was significantly lower when compared to both El2 and LiM within the same group (p= 0.008). Additionally, El1 exhibited slightly higher average temperatures (0.5-0.6 °C) in the malignant neoplasm (33.2 ± 2.4 °C) and non-neoplastic group (33.5 ± 1.5 °C) compared to benign neoplasms (32.6 ± 2.5 °C), although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.301). In conclusion, IRT is a promising tool for differentiating thermal emissions between skin tumors/lesions and healthy skin in dogs. Healthy areas were significantly warmer than affected tissue. Malignant neoplasms and non-neoplastic lesions showed higher thermal means in the tumoral area compared to benign neoplasms.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40633471/