PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Platelet-rich fibrin membrane did not improve tendon healing in dogs

By Visser, Lance C et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2011·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of the use of an autologous platelet-rich fibrin membrane to enhance tendon healing in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

Eight adult dogs with injuries to their patellar tendons (the tendons in the knee) underwent surgery where one tendon was treated with a special membrane made from their own blood (called a platelet-rich fibrin membrane), while the other tendon was left untreated. After four and eight weeks, both tendons showed signs of healing, but the treated tendons had more repair tissue. However, the quality of the healing was similar between the two groups, suggesting that while the membrane increased the amount of tissue, it didn't improve the healing process itself. This means that using this type of membrane may not be necessary for healthy tendon injuries.

People also search for: dog knee tendon injury treatment · patellar tendon repair in dogs · platelet-rich fibrin for dog injuries

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine effects of an autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane for enhancing healing of a defect of the patellar tendon (PT) in dogs. ANIMALS: 8 adult dogs. PROCEDURES: Defects were created in the central third of the PT in both hind limbs of each dog. An autologous PRF membrane was implanted in 1 defect/dog, and the contralateral defect was left empty. Dogs (n = 4/time period) were euthanized at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery, and tendon healing was assessed grossly and histologically via a semiquantitative scoring system. Cross-sectional area of the PTs was also compared. RESULTS: Both treated and control defects were filled with repair tissue by 4 weeks. There was no significant difference in the histologic quality of the repair tissue between control and PRF membrane-treated defects at either time point. At both time points, the cross-sectional area of PRF membrane-treated tendons was significantly greater (at least 2.5-fold as great), compared with that of sham-treated tendons. At 4 weeks, the repair tissue consisted of disorganized proliferative fibrovascular tissue originating predominantly from the fat pad. By 8 weeks, the tissue was less cellular and slightly more organized in both groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A PRF membrane did not enhance the rate or quality of tendon healing in PT defects. However, it did increase the amount of repair tissue within and surrounding the defect. These results suggested that a PRF membrane may not be indicated for augmenting the repair of acutely injured tendons that are otherwise healthy.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21529224/