Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Topical nalbuphine and oral tramadol for dog eye pain after injury
By Clark, Jason S et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2011·Eye Care for Animals, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of topical nalbuphine or oral tramadol as analgesics for corneal pain in dogs: a pilot study.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Four male Beagle dogs with corneal pain (pain in the eye) were treated with either a topical pain medication called nalbuphine or an oral pain reliever called tramadol after having a small wound created in their eye. The dogs were monitored for pain levels, and if their pain was too high, they received a stronger pain medication. While all dogs eventually healed within about 84 hours, more dogs in the nalbuphine group needed extra pain relief compared to those on tramadol. This suggests that tramadol might be a better option for managing corneal pain in dogs.
People also search for: dog eye pain treatment · tramadol for dogs · nalbuphine for dogs eye injury · Beagle corneal wound care
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of topical nalbuphine or oral tramadol in the treatment of corneal pain in dogs. ANIMALS STUDIED: Fourteen male Beagle dogs. PROCEDURES: Dogs were divided into three treatment groups and sedated with dexmedetomidine (5 μ/kg IV). A 4 mm corneal epithelial wound was created in the right eye (OD) of all dogs. Sedation was reversed with atipamazole IM. All dogs received pre/post ophthalmic examinations. Post operatively, Group NB (n = 5) received topical 1% preservative-free nalbuphine OD q8 h and an oral placebo PO q8 h. Group TR (n = 5) received tramadol (4 mg/kg) PO q8 h and topical sterile saline OD q8 h. Group CNTRL (n = 4) received topical sterile saline OD q8 h and an oral placebo q8 h. All dogs received topical 0.3% gentamicin OD TID until healed. Dogs were pain scored using a pain scoring system modified from the University of Melbourne pain scale at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h, then every 6 h by observers masked to treatment, until corneal wounds were healed. Treatment failure was recorded if cumulative pain scores were above a minimum threshold of acceptable pain and rescue analgesia of morphine (1.0 mg/kg IM) was administered subsequently. RESULT: Four dogs in Group NB, one dog in Group TR, and two dogs in Group CNTRL required rescue analgesia. There was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment failure between groups (P = 0.184). Mean time to rescue was 9.16 h. All corneal wounds were healed by 84 h. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest tramadol rather than nalbuphine should be further investigated for the treatment of corneal pain.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22050712/