PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Measuring tibia movement on dog knee X-rays with and without ligament

By Castaneda, Katrina A et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2018·MedVet Medical and Cancer Centers, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Ex vivo preliminary investigation of radiographic quantitative assessment of cranial tibial displacement at varying degrees of canine stifle flexion with or without an intact cranial cruciate ligament.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study looked at how the position of a dog's knee (stifle) affects the measurement of cranial tibial displacement, which can indicate a torn cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL). When the CrCL is completely torn, there is noticeable movement of the tibia, especially when the knee is bent at different angles. The researchers found that measuring the distance between certain points in the knee joint could help assess this displacement more accurately. This method could improve how veterinarians diagnose knee injuries in dogs.

People also search for: dog knee injury symptoms · cranial cruciate ligament tear treatment · how to tell if my dog has a torn ligament

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of cranial tibial subluxation can aid in the detection of joint instability as a result of CrCL injury. Detection of cranial tibial subluxation has been described using the tibial compression test (TCT) and cranial drawer test (CDT); however, diagnosis of CrCL insufficiency by assessing cranial subluxation motion of the tibia is subjective and difficult to quantify accurately. The aim of this study was to investigate a measurement technique to assess the degree of cranial tibial displacement relative to the femoral condyles on mediolateral projection stifle radiographs at varying degrees of stifle flexion (90°, 110°, and 135°) in CrCL intact, partially, and completely transected conditions. Radiographic measurements included: CrCL length and intercondylar distance (ICD), defined as the distance between the tibial mechanical axis (TMA) and the femoral condylar axis (FCA). The influence of CrCL status, stifle flexion angle, and measurement type on measured distance was evaluated. The relationship between CrCL length and ICD measurement was also assessed. RESULTS: Complete transection of the CrCL resulted in significant cranial tibial displacement. Stifle flexion angle affected ICD, but not CrCL length. Normalized measured CrCL length and ICD were significantly different; however, no differences existed between the change in distance detected by CrCL length and ICD measurements as CrCL transection status changed. Correlation coefficients detected a significant positive correlation between measured CrCL and ICD. CONCLUSION: The ICD measurement technique was able to quantify tibial displacement at various stifle flexion angles in the intact and completely transected CrCL conditions. The ICD measurement was more affected by stifle flexion angle than was the CrCL length.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30176906/