PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Hendra virus infection in dogs and risk of spreading virus

By Middleton, D J et al.·Published in Australian veterinary journal·2017·CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Australia·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Experimental Hendra virus infection of dogs: virus replication, shedding and potential for transmission.

Species:
dog
Breathing & coughDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of Beagle dogs was exposed to the Hendra virus to study how it affects them and whether they could spread it to other animals. The dogs generally showed no symptoms, but the virus was found in their mouths and other areas of the body. It was confirmed that the virus could be transmitted to ferrets through the dogs' oral secretions. While the dogs didn't get sick from the virus, their saliva could pose a risk of spreading it to humans during the early stages of infection.

People also search for: Hendra virus in dogs · dog saliva transmission risk · Beagle virus symptoms · dog infection transmission to ferrets

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Characterisation of experimental Hendra virus (HeV) infection in dogs and assessment of associated transmission risk. METHODS: Beagle dogs were exposed oronasally to Hendra virus/Australia/Horse/2008/Redlands or to blood collected from HeV-infected ferrets. Ferrets were exposed to oral fluids collected from dogs after canine exposure to HeV. Observations made and samples tested post-exposure were used to assess the clinical course and replication sites of HeV in dogs, the infectivity for ferrets of canine oral fluids and features of HeV infection in dogs following contact with infective blood. RESULTS: Dogs were reliably infected with HeV and were generally asymptomatic. HeV was re-isolated from the oral cavity and virus clearance was associated with development of virus neutralising antibody. Major sites of HeV replication in dogs were the tonsils, lower respiratory tract and associated lymph nodes. Virus replication was documented in canine kidney and spleen, confirming a viraemic phase for canine HeV infection and suggesting that urine may be a source of infectious virus. Infection was transmitted to ferrets via canine oral secretions, with copy numbers for the HeV N gene in canine oral swabs comparable to those reported for nasal swabs of experimentally infected horses. CONCLUSION: HeV is not highly pathogenic for dogs, but their oral secretions pose a potential transmission risk to people. The time-window for transmission risk is circumscribed and corresponds to the period of acute infection before establishment of an adaptive immune response. The likelihood of central nervous system involvement in canine HeV infection is unclear, as is any long-term consequence.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28124415/