PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How toceranib drug levels affect dogs with solid tumors

By Young-Rok Kim et al.·Published in Animals·2025·KU Animal Cancer Center, Konkuk University Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea, CH·View original on DOAJ

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Exposure–Response Relationships for Toceranib in Dogs with Solid Tumors: A Pilot Study

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with solid tumors was treated with toceranib, a common cancer medication, to see how different doses affected their response and side effects. The study found that the amount of the drug in the dogs' blood varied significantly between individuals, which means that some dogs might need different doses to get the best results without experiencing too many side effects. Although the researchers didn't find a strong link between drug levels and treatment success, they suggested that monitoring the drug in the blood could help veterinarians adjust doses for better outcomes.

People also search for: dog cancer treatment toceranib · side effects of toceranib in dogs · how to monitor cancer medication in dogs

Abstract

The existence of considerable interpatient variability in pharmacokinetic exposure necessitates dose adjustment to avoid potential adverse events and suboptimal efficacy in targeted therapy. Exposure–response relationships for toceranib phosphate (TOC), the most commonly used tyrosine kinase inhibitor in veterinary oncology, remain unclear. Correlations between TOC exposure and efficacy and safety were evaluated in dogs with solid tumors in our study. Plasma TOC was analyzed at 6 and 48 h post-administration. For the 10 dogs in the exposure–response analysis, the mean interpatient variabilities in dose-normalized peak (C<sub>max</sub>) and trough (C<sub>min</sub>) concentrations were 29% and 61%, respectively. Dose-normalized C<sub>max</sub> did not differ among weeks 1, 4, and 12 (<i>p</i> = 0.414), suggesting that steady-state plasma levels can be achieved within 1 week. Pharmacokinetic exposure at steady state was not significantly associated with efficacy (week 1 C<sub>max</sub>, <i>p</i> = 0.941; average C<sub>max</sub>, <i>p</i> = 0.548). C<sub>max</sub> was positively but nonsignificantly associated with the risk of adverse events (week 1 C<sub>max</sub>, <i>p</i> = 0.190; average C<sub>max</sub>, <i>p</i> = 0.109). These findings suggest the value of pharmacokinetic monitoring in optimizing TOC dosage and reducing its adverse effects in dogs with solid tumors. Clinicians should consider plasma TOC when managing TOC treatment in small-animal practice.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15071025