Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How multiplex fluorescent immunocytochemistry helps diagnose feline
By Evans, Samantha et al.·Published in Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery·2026·Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, United States·View original on Crossref →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: EXPRESS: Multiplex Fluorescent Immunocytochemistry is a Complementary Test for the Diagnosis of Feline Infectious Peritonitis: A Diagnostic Clinical Trial
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of cats showing signs of illness compatible with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) were tested using a new diagnostic method called multiplex fluorescent immunocytochemistry (MF-ICC) to see how well it could identify the disease. The study found that MF-ICC was fairly accurate, with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 81%, meaning it could correctly identify many cases of FIP, but it wasn't perfect. This test worked best when used alongside other common tests like RT-PCR and serology. While MF-ICC isn't a standalone solution, it can help veterinarians make a more informed diagnosis of FIP in cats.
People also search for: cat FIP symptoms · feline infectious peritonitis treatment · how to diagnose FIP in cats
Abstract
Objectives: Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a common and treatable viral disease of cats for which there is no single, reliable antemortem diagnostic test. The goals of this report were to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) of multiplex fluorescent immunocytochemistry (MF-ICC) for the diagnosis of FIP in clinical patients under field conditions, and to directly compare that accuracy to the diagnostic performance of other commonly used assays. Methods: Cats presenting with clinical signs compatible with FIP were enrolled at two academic veterinary teaching hospitals and tested using a combination of CBC, biochemistry, fluid analysis, cytology, MF-ICC, serology, and RT-PCR. Antibodies against both feline coronavirus and vimentin, as well as a nuclear stain, were used for the MF-ICC assay. Outcomes were determined by necropsy with histopathology and IHC, response to antiviral therapy, and/or clinical follow-up. Results: 84 cases comprising 58 cats with FIP and 26 without FIP (control cases) were included in this study. Using a threshold of ≥ 1 dual-expressing mononuclear cell, MF-ICC was found to have 77% sensitivity, 81% specificity, 92% positive predictive value, and 53% negative predictive value in this cohort. Using a threshold of ≥ 2 dual-expressing mononuclear cells improved specificity but reduced both sensitivity and overall diagnostic accuracy. MF-ICC was more sensitive, but less specific, in effusion fluids over tissues. MF-ICC resulted in the highest overall diagnostic accuracy (78%) when compared with serology (75%), RT-PCR (69%), and serum A:G ratio (76%). Conclusions and relevance: MF-ICC is an imperfect test but is considered complementary to other commonly used antemortem diagnostic assays for FIP. It can be used alongside RT-PCR and other minimally invasive tests to build a case for FIP in an individual patient.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612x261445145