Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Eye and ear temperature track rectal temperature in resting
By Zanghi, Brian M·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2016·Nestlé, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Eye and Ear Temperature Using Infrared Thermography Are Related to Rectal Temperature in Dogs at Rest or With Exercise.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of Labrador Retrievers and Beagles were studied to see if measuring their ear and eye temperatures with infrared thermography (IRT) could help track their body temperature during rest and exercise. The researchers found that ear temperature was a good indicator of rectal temperature, especially during exercise, while eye temperature was less reliable. Labradors tended to have slightly higher temperatures than Beagles, particularly after physical activity. Overall, IRT proved to be a useful tool for monitoring body temperature changes in dogs, which can help prevent overheating during exercise.
People also search for: dog overheating symptoms · infrared thermography for dogs · how to check dog temperature · Labrador exercise heat stress · Beagle body temperature monitoring
Abstract
Rectal body temperature (BT) has been documented in exercising dogs to monitor thermoregulation, heat stress risk, and performance during physical activity. Eye (BT) and ear (BT) temperature measured with infrared thermography (IRT) were compared to rectal (BT) temperature as the reference method and assess alternative sites to track hyperthermia, possibly to establish BTIRT as a passive and non-contact method. BT measures were recorded at 09:00, 11:30, 12:30, and 02:30 from Labrador Retrievers ( = 16) and Beagles ( = 16) while sedentary and with 30-min play-exercise (pre- and 0, 15, 30-min post-exercise). Total exercise locomotor activity counts were recorded to compare relative intensity of play-exercise between breeds. BT, BT, and BTwere measured within 5 min of the target time. Each BT method was analyzed by analysis of variance for main effects of breed and time. Method differences were compared using Bland-Altman plots and linear regression. Sedentary BT differed by breed for BT( < 0.0001), BT( < 0.0001), and BT( = 0.06) with Labs having on average 0.3-0.8°C higher BT compared to Beagles. Readings also declined over time for BT( < 0.0001) and BT( < 0.0001), but not for BT( = 0.63) for both breeds. Total exercise (30-min) activity counts did not differ ( = 0.53) between breeds. Time and breed interaction was significant in response to exercise for both BTand BT( = 0.035 and = 0.005, respectively), with a marginal interaction ( = 0.09) for BT. All the three methods detected hyperthermia with Labs having a higher increase compared to Beagles. Both BTand BTwere significantly ( < 0.0001) related to BTin all dogs with sedentary or exercise activity. The relationship between BTand BTimproved when monitoring exercise hyperthermia ( = 0.674) versus measures at rest ( = 0.381), whereas BTwas significantly related to BTregardless of activity ( = 0.615-0.735). Although BT readings were significantly related, method bias ( < 0.02) was observed for BTto slightly underestimate BT, whereas no bias was observed between BTand BT. This study demonstrates that IRT technology effectively measures both ear and eye temperature and enables effective monitoring of BT changes at rest, with exercise, and between breeds. However, ear, and not eye, temperature is a better reflection of rectal temperature.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28066775/