PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Why did my dog need an eye removed after parotid duct surgery?

By Zimmer, Jennifer L et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2019·Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Eye removal following parotid duct transposition surgery: A survey of current practice among veterinary ophthalmologists.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

Sixteen small dogs that had previously undergone a surgery to redirect saliva (parotid duct transposition) needed their eye removed due to various issues, including worsening corneal disease and discomfort. Most of these dogs had their eye removed between six months to over a year after the initial surgery. The eye removal surgeries were performed using different techniques, with some dogs experiencing complications like prolonged duct dilation, which resolved on its own or with treatment. Overall, the study suggests that ligation of the duct or reversing the surgery can be effective methods when removing the eye.

People also search for: dog eye removal after parotid duct surgery · corneal disease in dogs · complications after eye surgery in dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Identify dogs that required removal of an eye that had previously undergone a parotid duct transposition (PDT) and secondly to characterize demographics, surgical technique, and outcomes associated with it. PROCEDURE: An online survey was distributed to American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists (ACVO) and Veterinary Ophthalmology (VOPH) listservs asking members to report the breed, reason for eye removal, time between surgeries, surgical technique, complications, and additional therapy instituted for dogs requiring removal of an eye subsequent to PDT surgery. RESULTS: Sixteen dogs fit the inclusion criteria. Small breeds (<15&#xa0;kg) made up 80% of the study population. Time between surgeries was <6&#xa0;months (1/16), 6 to 12&#xa0;months (7/16), and &#x2265;1&#xa0;year (8/16). Reasons for eye removal included: advancing corneal disease (6/16), discomfort (6/16), reaction to saliva (4/16), decreased saliva production (2/16), glaucoma (1/16), orbital neoplasia (1/16), and endophthalmitis (1/16). Surgical techniques included: transection of the parotid duct without ligation (2/16), ligation (9/16), and reversal of the PDT with reimplantation into the mouth (5/16). Complications reported were two dogs who underwent duct ligation experienced prolonged dilation of the duct that resolved with medical therapy (1/2) or without additional therapy (1/2). CONCLUSION: Ligation of or reversal of the PDT with reimplantation into the mouth are appropriate adjunctive surgical techniques when removing an eye that previously underwent PDT surgery. Two dogs with nonfunctional PDT had complication-free eye removal with transection without ligation. Prolonged dilation of the duct is possible after eye removal with duct ligation and may resolve with time or medical management.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30716199/