PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

False negative heartworm tests in dogs on macrocyclic lactone

By Drake, Jason et al.·Published in Parasites & vectors·2015·Novartis Animal Health, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: False negative antigen tests in dogs infected with heartworm and placed on macrocyclic lactone preventives.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs diagnosed with heartworm were found to have false-negative results on antigen tests after being treated with monthly heartworm preventives and doxycycline. Researchers discovered that heating the blood samples revealed that more than half of these dogs actually had heartworm antigens present. This suggests that the treatment might cause immune complexes that interfere with test results, leading to confusion about whether the treatment is working. Additionally, many of the dogs were not consistently receiving their heartworm preventives as prescribed.

People also search for: dog heartworm treatment · false negative heartworm test · heartworm preventive compliance · dog heartworm symptoms · doxycycline for heartworm in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dogs with chronic inflammation, including those with heartworm being managed with macrocyclic lactones and doxycycline (slow kill, SK), may develop immune complexes that block detection of Dirofilaria immitis antigen on commercial tests. METHODS: To determine if SK could result in development of false-negative antigen tests, we collected serum samples from dogs that had been diagnosed with heartworm by antigen detection, with or without confirmation by detection of D. immitis microfilariae, placed on monthly macrocyclic lactones and doxycycline, and that later tested negative on an antigen test, and then tested them for antigen of D. immitis before and after treatment to disrupt immune complexes. RESULTS: Serum samples from a total of 15 dogs managed with SK were negative for antigen prior to heating on commercial assay (DiroCHEK, Zoetis) by colorimetric detection and spectrophotometry, but after heat treatment, 8/15 (53.3%) samples converted to positive. Review of the medical records of each dog indicated that, after the heartworm diagnosis, only 7/15 (46.7%) dogs appeared to receive preventive monthly as prescribed, including 3 dogs that had detectable antigen after heating the sample and 4 dogs that did not have detectable antigen after heating. Whole blood was available from 9 dogs; microfilariae of D. immitis were detected in 1 sample. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that immune complex formation in dogs infected with heartworm and managed with SK can induce false negative antigen test results, misleading veterinarians and owners about the efficacy of this approach. Moreover, compliance with preventive administration appears poor, even after a heartworm diagnosis. The presence of persistent microfilaremia in at least one dog has implications for resistance selection.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25648086/